Detroit - America's Future?

Will Detroit be the future of America?

ONLY IF WE ALLOW IT!

(Frosty Wooldridge (born 1947) is a US journalist, writer, environmentalist, traveler)

 

DETROIT

By Frosty Wooldridge

For 15 years, from the mid 1970's to 1990, I worked in  Detroit,  Michigan. I watched it descend into the abyss of crime, debauchery, gun play, drugs, school truancy, car-jacking, gangs and human depravity. I watched entire city blocks burned out. I watched graffiti explode on buildings, cars, trucks, buses and school yards. Trash everywhere!

Detroiters walked through it, tossed more into it, and ignored it. Tens of thousands, and then hundreds of thousands today exist on federal welfare, free housing and food stamps!

 

With Aid to Dependent Children, minority women birthed eight to 10, and in one case, one woman birthed 24 children as reported by the Detroit Free Press, all on American taxpayer dollars.

A new child meant a new car payment, new TV, and whatever mom wanted. I saw Lyndon Baines Johnson's 'Great Society' flourish in  Detroit . If you give money for doing nothing, you will get more hands out taking money for doing nothing.

 

Mayor Coleman Young, perhaps the most corrupt mayor in America, outside of Richard Daley in Chicago, rode Detroit down to its knees. He set the benchmark for cronyism, incompetence and arrogance. As a black man, he said, "I am the MFIC." The IC meant "in charge".

You can figure out the rest Detroit became a majority black city with 67 percent African-Americans.

 

As a United Van Lines truck driver for my summer job from teaching math and science, I loaded hundreds of American families into my van for a new life in another city or state.

 

Detroit plummeted from 1.8 million citizens to 912,000 today. At the same time, legal and illegal immigrants converged on the city for the free government hand outs, so much so, that Muslims number over 300,000. Mexicans number 400,000 throughout Michigan, but most work in Detroit. As the whites moved out, the Muslims moved in.

As the crimes became more violent, the whites fled. Finally, unlawful Mexicans moved in at a torrid pace. Detroit suffers so much shoplifting that grocery stores no longer operate in many inner city locations. You could cut the racial tension in the air with a knife!  Detroit may be one of our best examples of multiculturalism: pure dislike and total separation from  America.

 

Today, you hear Muslim calls to worship over the city like a new American Baghdad with hundreds of Islamic mosques in Michigan, paid for by Saudi Arabia oil money. High school flunk out rates reached 76 percent last June, according to NBC's Brian Williams. Classrooms resemble more foreign countries than America. English? Few speak it! The city features a 50 percent illiteracy rate and growing.

Unemployment hit 28.9 percent in 2009 as the auto industry vacated the city. In Time Magazine's October 4, 2009, "The Tragedy of Detroit: How a great city fell, and how it can rise again," I choked on the writer's description of what happened. "If Detroit had been ravaged by a hurricane, and submerged by a ravenous flood, we'd know a lot more about it," said Daniel Okrent. "If drought and carelessness had spread brush fires across the city, we'd see it on the evening news every night." Earthquake, tornadoes, you name it, if natural disaster had devastated the city that was once the living proof of American prosperity, the rest of the country might take notice.

But Detroit, once our fourth largest city, now 11th and slipping rapidly, has had no such luck. Its disaster has long been a slow unwinding that seemed to remove it from the rest of the country.

 

Even the death rattle that in the past year emanated from its signature industry brought more attention to the auto executives than to the people of the city, who had for so long been victimized by their dreadful decision making."

As Coleman Young's corruption brought the city to its knees, no amount of federal dollars could save the incredible payoffs, kickbacks and illegality permeating his administration. I witnessed the city's death from the seat of my 18-wheeler tractor trailer because I moved people out of every sector of decaying  Detroit .

 

"By any quantifiable standard, the city is on life support. Detroit's treasury is $300 million short of the funds needed to provide the barest municipal services," Okrent said. "The school system, which six years ago was compelled by the teachers' union to reject a philanthropist's offer of $200 million to build 15 small, independent charter high schools, is in receivership. The murder rate is soaring, and 7 out of 10 remain unsolved. Three years after Katrina devastated  New Orleans, unemployment in that city hit a peak of 11%. In Detroit today, the unemployment rate is 28.9%. That's worth spelling out: twenty-eight point nine percent.

At the end of Okrent's report, and he will write a dozen more about Detroit, he said, "That's because the story of Detroit is not simply one of a great city's collapse, it's also about the erosion of the industries that helped build the country we know today. The ultimate fate of Detroit will reveal much about the character of America in the 21st century.

 

If what was once the most prosperous manufacturing city in the nation has been brought to its knees, what does that say about our recent past? And if it can't find a way to get up, what does that say about America’s future?"

As you read in my book review of Chris Steiner's book,"$20 Per Gallon", the auto industry won't come back. Immigration will keep pouring more and more uneducated third world immigrants from the Middle East into Detroit, thus creating a beachhead for Islamic hegemony in America. If 50 percent illiteracy continues, we will see more homegrown terrorists spawned out of the Muslim ghettos of Detroit. Illiteracy plus Islam equals walking human bombs.

You have already seen it in Madrid, Spain, London, England, and Paris, France with train bombings, subway bombings and riots. As their numbers grow, so will their power to enact their barbaric Sharia Law that negates republican forms of government, first amendment rights, and subjugates women to the lowest rungs on the human ladder. We will see more honor killings by upset husbands, fathers and brothers that demand subjugation by their daughters, sisters and wives. Muslims prefer beheadings of women to scare the hell out of any other members of their sect from straying. Multiculturalism: what a perfect method to kill our language, culture, country and way of life.

I PRAY EVERYONE THAT READS THIS REALIZES THAT IF WE DON'T STAND UP, AND SCREAM AT WASHINGTON, AND OUR STATE, CITY AND LOCAL LEADERS THIS IS WHAT AWAITS THE REST OF AMERICA. IF YOU THINK MEXICANS AND MUSLIMS AND OTHER FORIEGNERS WILL EVENTUALLY FIT RIGHT IN THEN YOU ARE AS BIG A PART OF THE PROBLEM AS THEY ARE.

 

IF YOU THINK THIS IS JUST A BUNCH OF HOOEY AND YOU FEEL NO DUTY TO FIGHT FOR THIS COUNTRY, THEN I'M SORRY, I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT WILL TAKE FOR YOU TO STAND AND FIGHT ?  But you will have to live in your creation.

 

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.  Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin

 

IF YOU LOVE  AMERICA, PLEASE PASS THIS ALONG.

Place ObamaCare On Hold!

America needs your vote on the "Time Out on ObamaCare" Act, bill number S.281, authored by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX).

This amendment would COMPLETELY halt the ObamaCare health care nightmare from being implemented pending a final judicial ruling on its constitutionality.

ObamaCare is bad medicine for America because it kills jobs, bankrupts the government, drives up everyone's health insurance costs, puts bureaucratic “boards” in charge of rationing care, and ruins the world's best health care system – NOT A PERFECT SYSTEM, BUT THE WORLD'S BEST!  The 2800+ page ObamaCare bill was INTENTIONALLY set up with hidden agendas and “costs” which were not to be revealed to the public until AFTER the November 2012 elections.  There are currently 26 states in court to repeal this bill, and currently the number of waivers granted stands at 1400+ including seven entire states.  Most of these waivers have gone to Obama constituents who SUPPORTED ObamaCare, but do not want to suffer under its oppression.  More than 1400 waivers have already been issued to businesses and unions, AARP, more than 50% of all waivers have gone to unions, 20% of all waivers have gone to Ms. Pelosi’s district, and Mr. Reid’s whole state has been waivered, ALL supporters of ObamaCare.  This is CRONYISM in it’s ugliest form!  The sheer numbers of waiver requests has been so large that the House and Human Services (HHS) announced they were shutting down all waiver requests as of September, 2011, but appears to still be issuing waivers because of public outcry.  HHS has still refused to release details or criteria on how waivers are granted and refused.  Selective implementation and enforcement of ObamaCare OR ANY LAW is the first sign of tyranny.  A government empowered to determine arbitrarily who may operate outside the rule of law inevitably leads to corruption, ultimately resulting in tyranny.

Polls have consistently shown that a solid majority of Americans want Washington to reverse the GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER of health care and adopt a patient-centered approach.  The Obama Administration is rushing to implement this unpopular law in the face of the opposition of a majority of the American public, a majority of the House, a near-majority of the Senate, and a majority of the states, which latter are suing to have the law stayed on constitutional grounds.  Obama’s Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has found that Obama’s promise of 4 MILLION new jobs is false, and CBO estimates that ObamaCare will ACTUALLY destroy more than 800,000 EXISTING jobs.  Before casting his vote in favor of ObamaCare, Sen. Kent Conrad, North Dakota Democrat, described it as "a Ponzi scheme of the first order, the kind of thing that Bernie Madoff would have been proud of"(sic).

Since December, 2010, two federal district judges, in Virginia and Florida, have declared unconstitutional ObamaCare's "individual mandate" requiring all U.S. residents to purchase health insurance (the linch-pin of the entire, 2801-page law).  The rulings in these and other cases are being appealed by the Obama Administration's lawyers. The judge in the Florida case made clear that he is effectively ordering the government to stop enforcing the law on the 26 states who are parties to the lawsuit; yet the Obama administration has indicated it WILL NOT halt implementation.

To avoid wasting more time and money imposing costly burdens on individuals and employers that may eventually be ruled null and void by a decision of the Supreme Court, Congress MUST vote on and ultimately adopt Sen. Hutchison's "Time Out on ObamaCare" Act, bold legislation that would impose a moratorium on further implementation of ObamaCare the until the courts render a final judicial decision of its constitutionality.

WE THE PEOPLE ARE REQUIRING YOU TO SUPPORT THE CONGRESSIONAL OATH YOU TOOK WHEN YOU ACCEPTED OFFICE IN THE U.S. CONGRESS, TO SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

GOD BLESS AMERICA

This fax was sent to POTUS, Gov. Perry, GOP Candidates Romney, West, Senators Cornyn, Hutchinson, Rubio, Snowe, McConnell, Reid, Feinstein, Reed, Murray, Boxer, Tester, Kyl, Representatives Boehner, Cantor, Ryan, DeMint, Poe, Rand Paul, Levin, Pelosi, New first-term House Republicans Berg, Noem, Crawford, Gosar, Benishek, Nunnelee, Guinta, McKinley, Griffin, Huizenga, Ellmers, Rigell, Womack, Runyan, Heck, Kelly, Herrera, Gardner, Palazzo, Nugent, Lankford, McCarthy, and various Conservative and Liberal media outlets.

Where is the BLACK OUTRAGE at Obama's Dismal Leadership?

My playlist auto plays but can be started/stopped, change songs, volume controls - scroll down and find playlist on the right side.

Where is the BLACK OUTRAGE at Obama's dismal failures to America as a whole, but even greater failure to his own CONSTITUENCY?

MAYBE HERE, MAYBE NOW, AND MAYBE JUST IN TIME!

The Obama dismal record has demonstrated itself from BEFORE he was elected by a DIVERSE constituency.  But the black outrage is only getting here now.

CNN's complaint of the lack of transparency of the Obama administration as promised by "candidate"Obama!

They also Remind Pelosi of her statment supporting "transparency", but left out her statement "Pass the bill so we can find out what is in them"

Most secretive administration in the history of government?  OBAMA'S ADMINISTRATION IS THE MOST SECRETIVE ADMINISTRATION IN THE HISTORY OF GOVERNMENT AND THE LEAST TRANSPARENT.  He also, after three years in office has done NONE of the promises he makes here in this video!

Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA), member Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), sweating and spinning profusely in a town-hall meeting with her black constituents, who seem a bit "RACIST" towards her?

Congresswoman Pelosi's (D-CA) previously mentioned "infamous" statement.  Is anyone out there BELIEVING" THIS KOOL-AID?  If so please leave a comment explaining HOW ON EARTH YOU CAME TO THAT CONCLUSION.

CNN caught candidate Obama on his "NO LOBBYISTS" campaign pledge.  NO KIRAN, IT IS NOT "CUTTING OUT A LOT OF TALENT" IF OBAMA HAD NOT LIED, IT WOULD BE CUTTING OUT A LOT OF CORRUPTION, CRONYISM, AND SAVING TAXPAYERS BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, IF ONLY HE MEANT WHAT HE SAID.

JOBS, JOBS, JOBS - BLAH, BLAH, BLAH          BLAME, BLAME, BLAME - BLAH, BLAH, BLAH

START NOW, START NOW, START NOW - BLAH, BLAH, BLAH          OBAMA LIES, MORE LIES, MORE LIES!

MSNBC discussion of the Waters CBC "near riot" - SPIN, SPIN, SPIN - GETTING DIZZY YET?

Congresswoman Waters (D-CA) and CBC member slips and outs herself as a SOCIALIST!  AND NO JAMES, FOR "THIS DOG & PONY SHOW" LETS JUST CALL IT SOCIALISM AS MS. WATERS DID, AND NOT TRY TO "SOFTEN" IT BY REDEFINING IT "NATIONALISM"!  BUT NICE TRY JAMES.  CONSERVATIVES 1 - FOX NEWS 0

FOX News points out that the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) is trying to "SPIN" the CBC constituancy revolt to the MEDIA.  THE SAME MEDIA THAT REPORTS NOTHING NEGATIVE ABOUT OBAMA ESPECIALLY WHEN IT IS TRUTH!  The video points out that some CBC Congressmen are seriously considering LEAVING the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC)  THE OBAMA ERA or error SEEMS TO BE CRUMBLING?

C-SPAN VIDEO CAPTURES OBAMA SWEATING, STRESSING, AND FREAKING OUT AT A CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS (CBC) SPEECH WHERE HE COMPLAINS TO HIS LARGEST SUPPORTERS TO "STOP THE COMPLAINING, QUIT FEELING SORRY FOR YOURSELF, SLIP OUT OF THEIR BEDROOM SLIPPERS, STOP THE GRUMBLING, STOP THE  WHINING", ETC.  CONSERVATIVES DON'T BUY IT WHEN HE ATTACKS US AS RACISTS, AND DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THE BLACK PEOPLE WILL TAKE IT EITHER?  WHERE DOES OBAMA GET THE MALIGNANT NARCISSISM, AND ELITIST BILE TO RANT AGAINST HIS BIGGEST SUPPORTERS LIKE THIS?  HE ALMOST SEEMS RACIST?

Rev. Perryman with a new perspective on Obama's RACISM

Gun Control - A CRIMINAL's Best friend!

The True Effects of Gun Control

Fort Hood, Columbine, Arizona senator Gabrielle Giffords, Virginia Tech — what do all these have in common?

A crazy person with a gun . . . in a gun-free zone!

It was instituted that as of 1982, no one shall have handguns in Chicago city limits.  Since then it has been a city ordinance and the funny thing is Chicago just took over as city with the most murder in the US.

I thought you all would like to see the now available data from Down Under.

 It has now been over a year since gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars.

The first year results are now available:

-Australia-wide, homicides are up 6.2 percent;

-Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6 percent;

-Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent); 

In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up
300 percent as compared with the last one year period when private
ownership of a firearm was legal.  The law-abiding citizens did turn in their personal firearms, the criminal element did not (and thus criminals in Australia still possess their guns.)

-While data for the 25 years preceding the confiscation of privately
owned guns showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months as criminals now are assured their victims will be unarmed. 

-There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults
of the elderly, while the resident is at home.  Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns.

-This story of well intentioned government intervention in the
rights of lawful individuals to own and possess firearms won't be seen in the mainstream US media or on the American evening news.

 President Obama who advocates a similar confiscation in the US will not be reporting any of this to you.  But, the Australian experience speaks for itself. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and yes, gun-control laws affect only the law-abiding citizens. 

Americans must take note before it's too late!

There is little empirical evidence that reducing general access to firearms reduces criminal violence.  In fact, overwhelming empirical evidence suggests that the more punitive gun control is, the greater the level of violent crime.  For example: 

1.  US per capita handgun ownership remained stable in the first 30 years of the 20th century, while the homicide rate rose tenfold; between 1937 and 1963, the American homicide rate fell 35.7% 

2.  In 1976, Washington D.C. enacted stringent gun controls. Since then, the homicide rate has risen 134% while the national rate fell 2%. 

3.  Maryland claims to have the "toughest gun laws" in the U.S., and has the highest robbery rate, and ranks 4th in violent crimes and murders.

4.  20% of American crimes occur in 4 cities with roughly 6% of the U.S. population (Detroit, Chicago, New York and Washington D.C.). Each has a virtual prohibition on private handguns. 

5.  Switzerland has fewer gun controls than the U.S., and lower crime.  Almost EVERY home is Switzerland has a weapon.

6.  Australia and England, which have essentially banned gun ownership, have the highest rates of robbery, sexual assault and assault among the top 17 industrialized countries. 

7.  Since banning guns, the UK has seen a dramatic rise in violent crime. 

8.  Since banning guns, Australia has seen greater than 100% increases in armed robbery, kidnapings, assaults, attempted murder and sexual assaults.

9.  Alberta has the highest rates of firearm ownership in Canada. Alberta does not have the highest crime rate in Canada, and has the lowest crime rate in Western Canada.

Alberta has the highest gun ownership in Canada. As such, Albertans favor the right to bear arms to a much greater extent than other Canadians.

Further, restrictive gun control harms certain members of the population more than others, especially when self-defense is an issue.  Women, by nature, tend to not have the physical strength of men.  In a criminal attack by a man against a woman, the woman will in most cases be at a disadvantage.  Firearms counteract this difference.  Abridging the right to bear arms disproportionately harms women, which leads to some questions regarding the equality of right under the law.

In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control.  From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.  By 1987 that figure had risen to 61,911,000.

China established gun control in 1935.  From 1948 to 1952, 10,076,000 political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated in Kuomintang China, and by 1987 another 35,236,000 exterminations were carried out under the Communists.

Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.

Guatemala established gun control in 1964.  From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, without the means to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Uganda established gun control in 1970.  From 1971 to 1979 under General Idi Amin Dada, 300,000 Christians and political rivals of Amin, unable to defend them­selves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Cambodia established gun control in 1956.  Between 1975 and 1979, 2,035,000 "educated" people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

In a March 1976 coup in Argentina, a military junta seized power and went on a campaign to wipe out left-wing terrorism with terror far worse than the one they were combating.  For seven years thousands of people, most of them dissidents and innocent civilians unconnected with terrorism, were arrested and then vanished without a trace, the Argentinian service chief's version of Hitler's Nacht und Nebel directive.  After democracy was restored in 1983, a national commission was appointed to investigate the fate of "los desaparecidos."  That report revealed the systematic abductions of men women and children and the methodic use of torture and murder.  Human rights groups say up to 30,000 people were killed or "disappeared" as the military waged its campaign against a disarmed citizenry.

The United Nations imposed gun control after civil war broke out in Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1992.  Although the town of Srebrenica was a UN-designated "safe area," in July of 1995 more than 7,000 unarmed Muslim men and boys were murdered by Serb forces as the UN forces in the town proved unable or unwilling to help its Muslim population.

Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control:  at least 56 MILLION, that we know about.  The places are all too familiar:  Stalin's Russia, Nazi Germany, Communist China, Uganda, Rwanda, Guatemala, Cambodia, Armenia, the Sudan, Bosnia and many more.  EVERY country there is Socialist or Communist.

Even in the new Millennium…

In April 2000, toward the end of Sierra Leone's 11-year civil war in which the United Nations convinced civilians to surrender their private weapon, those citizens ended up defenseless when 500 UNAMSIL peacekeepers in the east, unable to protect even themselves, were taken hostage by rebels moving on the capital of Freetown.

And back in Uganda, extreme brutality and death continue today due to the government's continued attempts at "forceful disarmament" of the civilian populace, primarily Karamojong tribespeople.

Additionally, in 2006 the genocide of unarmed victims in Darfur was unfathomably bad, more than two million people, yet no one acted to stop it. The United Nations has failed to issue any meaningful sanctions against the openly racist Islamist dictatorship in Khartoum perpetrating it, or to even call it genocide.



David B. Kopel, Paul Gallant and Joanne D. Eisen, writing in the Notre Dame Law Review (Volume 81, Number 4), note that that national gun-control statutes7 for the Darfur victims effectively prevent self defense.





So the next time someone talks in favor of gun control, ask them "WHO DO YOU WANT TO ROUND UP AND EXTERMINATE?"



Something to think about as the Liberal media attempts to demonize firearms and gun owners in what amounts to an unending propaganda blitz.  They are sympathetic to the politicians who seek to blame crime on "the easy availability of guns" and "illegal guns" through evil devices like "the gun show loophole."







At one point gun confiscation in this country was unthinkable, yet we saw it occur quite openly in 1991 in New York City, enabled solely due to a registration scheme put into place in 1967 when Mayor John V. Lindsay signed a long gun registration law which was later used as a confiscation list.

1.      It's clear that Adolf Hitler (1889-1945) deemed gun control a critical element of his National Socialist policy. After having occupied Russian territory he wrote in Tischegesprache Im Fuhrerhauptquartier 1941-1942:

Der größte Unsinn, den man in den besetzen Ostgebieten machen könnte, sei der, den unterworfenen Völkern Waffen zu geben. Die Geschicte lehre, daß alle Herrenvölker untergegangen seien, nachdem sie den von ihnen unterworfenen Volkern Waffen bewilligt hatten.

Translation: "The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so." Hitler's Table-Talk at the Fuhrer's Headquarters 1941-1942, Dr. Henry Picker, editor. (Athenaum-Verlag, Bonn, 1951)] (But see N. A. Browne's The Myth of Nazi Gun Control)

2.    Human rights groups say actually up to 500,000 people were killed during Idi Amin's 8-year rule. Bodies were dumped into the Nile River because graves couldn't be dug fast enough. At one point, so many bodies were fed to crocodiles that the remains occasionally clogged intake ducts at Uganda's main hydroelectric plant at Jinja.

3.    During the short four years of its rule in Cambodia, Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge government murdered over 31 percent of the entire Cambodian population.

4.    A government report "officially" lists only 9,000 victims.

5.     According to Robert J. Cottrol in "A Liberal Democrat’s Lament" (The American Enterprise, September/October 1999), University of Hawaii political scientist Rudolph J. Rummel, one of the leading students of democide (mass murder of civilian populations by governments), has estimated that nearly 180 million people were murdered by their own governments in the 20th century, the largest single cause of untimely death in the world.

The familiar list of mass murderers – Castro, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Mussolini – only scratches the surface.  Notice all are Socialists or Communists.

6.   The mass slaughter of helpless, unarmed civilian populations continues to this very day in Sudan, Rwanda, and parts of the former Yugoslavia.

7.     Kopel, Gallant and Eisen on The Consequences of United Nations Gun Confiscation in East Africa: forceful disarmament in Kenya and Uganda.

8.   
 A permit applicant in Darfur must be over 30 years old, have specified social and economic status, and be physically examined by a doctor. A handgun owner can legally purchase only 15 rounds of ammunition a year, hardly enough to gain any level of proficiency. Violation of the gun control laws include severe penalties, ranging up to execution by the government.

US SENATE STANDS WITH NRA IN STRONGLY OPPOSING UN GUN CONTROL 

YES , AS YOU CAN SEE HERE – IT IS NOT ONLY POSSIBLE, BUT IS THE PLAN TO “OVER REGULATE” ENTIRE POPULATIONS OUT OF EXISTANCE

Obama is not against guns, he surrounds himself with armed guards with machine guns, both in Chicago and in Washington DC – HE DOESN’T WANT THE CITIZENTY TO LAWFULLY CARRY GUNS – I WONDER WHY THAT IS?

Senator Snowe - NO Obama "Stimulus" Support

Senator Snowe,

I just found out about your support for Obama’s corrupt implementation of his “stimulus” agenda.

I am recently retired, and a veteran.  Since retirement I have become politically active, and now make contributions to Conservative causes and politicians which promote a smaller and constitutionally based, federal government.  I have developed a strategy which allows me to have an influence on politicians who feel safe because I live in Texas and cannot “vote” for them.  What I do is to Google their next election date, and then Google their possible opponents in order to make contributions to the opponent who seems to be the strongest Conservative for the cause in which I am interested .

Currently I am making “opponent” contributions at an approximately 15% level of my total contributions.  I expect that 15% to climb toward 30% as the 2012 elections get closer.  My strategy has worked pretty well for me, and I used it a few months ago in Wisconsin against three cowardly Democrats who fled the state to avoid doing the JOBS FOR WHICH THEY WERE ELECTED.

I have found my strategy to also work well with RINOs.

I am going to use my strategy against your re-election by contributions to Scott D’Amboise.  I am going to wait a week before making my first contribution to his campaign, to allow you to correct me IF YOU DO NOT SUPPORT Obama’s ineffective and wasteful stimulus agenda.  My email address is *******************, and my cell number is ************.

YES I AM A TEXAN AND CAN NOT VOTE FOR YOU,  AND YES I CAN HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR POLITICAL DECISIONS IN MAINE!
This fax was sent to Senator Olympia Snowe (R-Ma)

NO UN Palestinian Aid or Support

Dear Member of Congress:

We the people demand that the U.S. Congress halt all US foreign aid to the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Gaza – whether direct or through the U.N. – if the Palestinian Authority seeks General Assembly admission as either a statehood nation, or as an observer.

We cannot permit this terrorist organization to be admitted to the Assembly, even as an observer nation, enabling them to participate in the Human Rights Council and the International Court of Justice.  With blood on its hands, and stated goal for the destruction of Israel, the Palestinian Authority and its Hamas allies cannot be permitted to make these organizations a further travesty.  Require that if they want US aid and support, they MUST recognize Israel’s right to exist, and all rocket attacks on innocent Israeli citizens MUST stop immediately!

WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE STAND WITH THE ISRAELI PEOPLE, AND SO MUST THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE TO US!

The UN budgetary process has become a morass of deception and a terrible misuse of America’s and other nation’s fiscal support!  UN Secretary General Bam Ki-moon in his 1,702 page, 2011 budget, makes the deeply misleading claim of a $4.9 BILLION (only a 0.5% increase over the previous UN budget).  This complex document ACTUALLY SHOWS that the deceptive Mr. Bam is on track to surpass his previous record as the biggest spender in UN history.

The $4.9 BILLION misleading CLAIM is the “Regular” UN budget, but when you include the “extra-budgetary” spending hidden in the huge document, the total UN budget balloons up to more than $14 BILLION!  And this hidden figure has ALWAYS been exceeded in UN budgets from previous years.  The hidden “extra-budgetary” expenses are peacekeeping costs, “special political missions”, a mind boggling number of UN Cost Centers, UN technology upgrades called the Umoja Project, an additional 22,421 employees (more than TWICE the number of employees listed in the “regular” budget), and ancillary UN organizations (all with multi BILLION dollar, separate budgets) such as United Nations Development Program (UNDP), World Food Program (WFP), and World Health Organization (WHO), etc, etc, etc.

For comparison, 2002 through 2007, the UN budget has been growing at 17% annually, so excluding the Obama administration runaway spending beginning in 2009, the US budget over the same period 2002 through 2007, has grown only 7% annually!

America has always borne the brunt of this secretive UN budget.  In 2007, the top 17 dues-paying countries in the U.N. paid 86.5 percent of the entire U.N. regular budget, while the 128 lowest-paying members paid only 1 percent of the regular UN budget.  With America’s “extra-budgetary” contribution, that means that we pay almost 30%, the next 16 countries pay about 5.4% each, and the next 128 countries pay about 0.1% each.  America pays 30 cents of every UN dollar spent, next 16 countries each pay 5.4 cents of every UN dollar spent, and the next 128 countries each pay ONE TENTH of a penny of every UN dollar spent!

Either start using our 25+% support of the UN to promote American positions, OR CEASE ALL UN SUPPORT, GET OUT OF THE UN, AND GET THE UN OFFICES OUT OF THE UNITED STATES of AMERICA!  THE UN HAS BEEN INFILTRATED AND TAKEN OVER BY THIRD WORLD TERRORISTS!

Related to this IMMEDIATE problem with the UN and the Palestinian Authority, is the Obama Administration’s ill conceived foreign aid agenda.  His agenda sends BILLIONS of taxpayers’ dollars, as foreign aid, to foreign anti-American nations and organizations, remodeling mosques overseas, etc.

ALL THESE OBAMA AGENDA EXPENDITURES MUST STOP AS WE SUFFER THROUGH THE ECONOMIC CRISIS THAT HIS AGENDA HAS CREATED FOR AMERICA!

This fax was sent to POTUS, Gov. Perry, GOP Candidates Romney, West, Senators Cornyn, Hutchinson, Rubio, Snowe, McConnell, Reid, Feinstein, Reed, Murray, Boxer, Tester, Kyl, Representatives Boehner, Cantor, Ryan, DeMint, Poe, Rand Paul, Levin, Pelosi, New first-term House Republicans Berg, Noem, Crawford, Gosar, Benishek, Nunnelee, Guinta, McKinley, Griffin, Huizenga, Ellmers, Rigell, Womack, Runyan, Heck, Kelly, Herrera, Gardner, Palazzo, Nugent, Lankford, McCarthy, and various Conservative and Liberal media outlets.

NO Continuing Appropriations Resolution

In May, we had the Ryan budget, which proposed sweeping changes that would set our nation on a more sustainable and prosperous course.  That was a TERRIFIC MISTAKE you made in supporting the Democratic proposal.  The usual hidden items in the Democratic budget was a DRAMATIC raise for the debt ceiling, and as you found out – the scare tactic that you were afraid of, HAPPENED ANYWAY and the world did not come to an end when our credit rating was downgraded.

WE MUST STOP THE OBAMA'S AGENDS'S OUT-OF-CONTROL FEDERAL SPENDING!

I faxed, wrote, and called advising you to stand strong on either the Ryan plan or the Cut, Cap, and Balance Act (which had already passed the House), because THOSE WERE THE ONLY OPTIONS WE HAD TO MAKE AN IMPACT ON GOVERNMENTAL SPENDING, AND MET THE MOODY CRITERIA TO AVOID A CREDIT RATING DOWNGRADE.  But you were scared, and caved to Obama.  IS YOUR INTENTION TO REPEAT THAT MISTAKE AGAIN WITH H.J.Res79?

You have seen Obama’s approval polls dropping consistently and we hope to sweep him from the White House in November, 2012.  THE QUESTION IS, WILL YOU BE SWEPT OUT WITH HIM?  We are watching now.

Obama is causing much suffering – stop him early, we suffer less – stop him later, we suffer MORE, and later means his agenda is more difficult to stop and portions of his agenda may have become permanent.

Obama is forcing us to suffer, but we choose to suffer LESS, NOT MORE, and certainly NOT PERMANENTLY.

We will not hold you responsible for our suffering, but WE WILL HOLD YOU RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR SUFFERING MORE, OR SUFFERING PERMANENTLY.  We are watching now.

H.J.Res.79, the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, would fund the government through November 18, 2011 at an annual level of $24 BILLION ABOVE the House-passed Ryan budget.  THAT IS $24 BILLION TOO MUCH!

Now is NOT the time to increase spending levels, NOT EVEN SLIGHTLY ABOVE THE AGREED-TO BUDGET.  We MUST reduce the size of government and return to the 1990s level spending.  THAT ALONE WOULD WIPE OUT THE DEFICIT IN THREE YEARS!

We don’t need superfluous and duplicate federal agencies – we don’t need the corruption, we don’t need the “pork”, we don’t need the Chicago style “crony” payoffs, we don’t need the bloated federal payrolls, we don’t need the lobbyists, we don’t need the Union stranglehold, and we don’t need to spend TRILLIONS for remodeling foreign mosques and foreign aid to our enemies overseas.

Oppose H.J.Res 79; support spending discipline.  DO NOT FAIL US THIS TIME.

It would be a HUGE mistake to vote for anyone except the GOP candidate in November 2012.  Obama MUST be removed from office.  It would NOT BE A MISTAKE to look for a third party candidate in the 2016 Presidential election, if the GOP President continued “business as usual” after 2012.  We are watching now.

GOD BLESS YOU WITH THE STRENGTH OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS, AND IN THE ABSENCE OF THAT, GOD BLESS AMERICA – Both God, and We the People, are watching now.

This fax was sent to POTUS, Gov. Perry, GOP Candidates Romney, West, Senators Cornyn, Hutchinson, Rubio, Snowe, McConnell, Reid, Feinstein, Reed, Murray, Boxer, Tester, Kyl, Representatives Boehner, Cantor, Ryan, DeMint, Poe, Rand Paul, Levin, Pelosi, New first-term House Republicans Berg, Noem, Crawford, Gosar, Benishek, Nunnelee, Guinta, McKinley, Griffin, Huizenga, Ellmers, Rigell, Womack, Runyan, Heck, Kelly, Herrera, Gardner, Palazzo, Nugent, Lankford, McCarthy, and various Conservative and Liberal media outlets.

Michelle's Ties to the Muslim Brotherhood

A common and consistent Obama strategy to implement his political agenda, has been a large amount of “RE-DEFINITION”, or “PERVERSION” of a federal system already in place, in order to change its direction to conform to the “Obama agenda”.  This seems to have been an effective strategy for Obama which usually escapes notice by the victims.

I WONDER IF THIS STRATEGY CAN BE TRACED TO AYERS, ALINSKI, MARX, OR OTHER SOCIAL REVOLUTIONARY STRATEGIST?  Until I find out if the strategy was created and defined by someone else, I am going to call it Obama’s Strategic Mis-Direction Strategy (SMDS)”.

 

TAKE A LOOK AT THIS EXAMPLE of Obama’s Strategic Mis-Direction Strategy (SMDS):

Michelle Obama Ties to the Muslim Brotherhood

The Muslim Brotherhood is the oldest, and one of the largest Islamic groups.  And is the largest political opposition organization in many Arab states.  It was created in 1928, and the Brotherhood’s stated goal is Islamic political and religious change throughout the world.

Their official stance is that they are non-violent, but they have beern suppressed throughout the Middle East for their violence, murder, and assassinations.  They believe that political reform is the true and natural gateway for all other kinds of reform.  The Muslim Brotherhood is banned in Egypt and other countries and is considered to be the father of the modern Islamic terrorist movement.

The Obama administration has been allying with, and appointing organizing TERRORISTS INTO U.S. FEDERAL AGENCIES.

The group’s objectives, include the “global conquest of Islam” and “reestablishing the Islamic Caliphate, the “public and private duties of jihad,” and the “struggles Muslims must wage against Israel.”

President appointed James Clapper Director of National Intelligence TO REFUSE TO RECOGNIZE THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD AS EXTREMIST in contradiction to FBI Director Robert Mueller who believes they are a terrorist group.  The Gaza terrorist group Hamas was seeded from the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as several other terrorist organizations.

Was Hillary Clinton aware that her Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Adiden’s MOTHER IS A MEMBER OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD?

Michelle Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood

Posted by EILEEN F. TOPLANSKY on September 18, 2011  on American Thinker.

With the news that "INFILTRATION of the federal government by members of the radical Muslim Brotherhood is worse than some have warned," it should come as no surprise that while Obama has been COURTING THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD operatives, his wife has also gotten into the act. 

According to the toolkit site, the LET’S MOVE! initiative, started by First Lady Michelle Obama, has an ambitious national goal of addressing the challenge of childhood obesity within a generation, so that children born today reach a healthy adulthood.  Let's Move! engages every sector impacting the health of children and provides schools, families, and communities with simple tools to help kids be more active, eat better, and get healthy."

Thus, faith-based and neighborhood organizations have a unique and critical role to play in ending childhood obesity and addressing related issues of hunger. Your organizations are trusted leaders in your community, which makes you well-positioned to take action. Children learn many lessons about healthy living and well-being in faith- and community-based settings that set the foundation for their lifestyles as adults.  Let's Move Faith and Communities is designed to help faith-based and neighborhood organizations transform neighborhoods, engage communities, and promote healthy choices."

Consequently, towards the end of July 2011, ISLAMIC RELIEF USA (IRUSA) "a faith-based disaster relief and development organization, celebrated the inauguration of its Summer Food Service Program at the An Nur School in Lanham, Maryland."  The White House announced that IRUSA "had a collaborative partnership with the USDA's Center for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships and that IRUSA had pledged to host 50 sites as part of a MICHELLE OBAMA INITIATIVE."

So while an FBI agent confirmed that AT LEAST THREE OPERATIVES of the Egypt-based Brotherhood -- whose credo is “Jihad is our way and death in the cause of Allah is our dream” -- have penetrated the Obama administration," the First Lady is now dealing with an organization that boasts of such people as Yaser Haddara who is a member of the IRUSA board since 2006 and its chairman until May 2011.

According to the ISLAMIC RELIEF USA’S OWN SITE, "Dr. Haddara was one of the developers and lead trainers for the Student Leadership Training Program that was jointly sponsored by the Muslim American Society and the Muslim Association of Canada.  Dr. Haddara has been actively involved in several community organizations including the Islamic Society at Stanford University, the Muslim Community Association of the Bay Area, the Islamic Society of North America (Western Region), the Muslim American Society, and the Muslim Association of Canada."  Like the criminal ACORN organization where Obama served as attorney before he lost his attorney’s license, the Muslim Brotherhood obtains secrecy by promoting their goals under many different organizational names.

Didn't realize?  Does Rotary Club do BEHEADINGS?

One of the main front organizations of the Muslim Brotherhood, the EXTREMIST ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA’S (ISNA) "leadership does not accept Islamic practices that fall outside the version of Islam propagated by Saudi Arabia and the Muslim Brotherhood."  Furthermore, in addition to terrorism, the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD SPREADS POLITICAL ISLAM, which weds religion and politics into a potent force that clashes with pluralistic democracies."

According to the 2007 report entitled EXTREMISM AND THE ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA (ISNA), "ISNA is clearly connected to Islamic radicals and terrorist organizations, but it is not simply guilty by association -- its own ideology is marked by extreme social, political, and religious views."

Hence, "ISNA's ideology is its leaders' views of Islam within the context of religion and politics, where they believe in Islamic supremacy" as exemplified in the following statement:  “In considering the earth as an arena for Islam, Allah has promised its inheritance to His righteous people, and He has promised that Islam Will prevail over other religions."

So how does one reconcile this with IRUSA's CEO Abed Ayoub who claims that "IRUSA's mission is to alleviate suffering, hunger, illiteracy, and disease REGARDLESS of color, race, gender, or creed"?

Also troubling is the point that “According to the most influential Islamic authorities, zakat (alms in Arabic) can be given ONLY TO MUSLIMS."   So how does this figure in Michelle Obama's outreach program?  She can give only to Muslims?

Moreover, in January of 2011, Daniel Pipes described how "Islamic  charities” SQUANDER MONEY.

He explained how the Islamic Society of North America's Canada branch had engaged in "gross mismanagement" whereby less than one-quarter of monies collected went to the Muslim recipients.  Pipes further explained that "ISNA's management refused to give the auditor all the necessary documents" and thus it was not possible to follow "the trail of funds transferred from ISNA to other organizations."   Pipes ends his article by stating that "Islamic charities” already have a notorious reputation because of their ties to terrorism;  this case shows that they must be watched for more venal problems as well."

Further NEFARIOUS associations go to the Islamic Relief Worldwide (IRW).   IRW has had directors who are linked to the U.K. and European Muslim Brotherhood.

One director was a former minister of religious affairs in the Sudan and also held numerous positions associated with the global Muslim Brotherhood.  In 2006 the Israeli government announced "the arrest of an IRW worker for activities related to supporting Hamas."  Moreover, "Islamic Relief was one of the founding members of the Union of Good."  According to STEVEN MERLEY of the Hudson Institute, “The Union of Good is a coalition of Islamic charities that provides financial support to both the Hamas “social” infrastructure, as well as its terrorist activities.  It is headed by global Muslim Brotherhood leader Youssef  Qaradawi, and most of the trustees and member organizations are associated with the global Muslim Brotherhood.  The Union of Good was banned by Israel in 2002 and was recently designated a terrorist entity by the United States."

As far back as 2004, Daniel Pipes described the Muslim American Society (MAS) and explained "how it seeks to REPLACE the Constitution with the Koran."  Though the MAS "goes about its work quietly; it is NONE THE LESS DANGEROUS  -  and perhaps more so - for that."

In August 2010, the Muslim Brotherhood-associated "Coordinating Council of Muslim Organizations" (CCMO) brought Muslim leaders to attend a special workshop presented by the White House and U.S. government agencies (INCLUDING HOMELAND SECURITY) to "PROVIDE AS A STIMULOUS TO THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD the groups funding, government assistance and resources."  According to a post by Christine Brim at Andrew Breitbart's Big Peace, "the workshop would apparently provide special access for these Muslim Brotherhood organizations:  the organizers pledged to provide “direct access” and “cut through red tape.”  And after the workshop, an Iftar dinner (breaking the fast of Ramadan) commenced.  The event was announced by the ISNA, an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism finance trial."

That’s another example of the White House and the Muslim Brotherhood “breaking bread” together!

Notwithstanding the concern about the Muslim Brotherhood connections, Meghan Clyne, editor of National Affairs at the Weekly Standard, asserts that  while "much of what the Michelle Obama “toolkit” recommends is innocuous -- encouraging churches to host kids' intramural sports leagues, for instance several sections illustrate the Obamas' strange understanding of the role of religious communities in America and suggest how, under this president, faith-based offices at the White House and in the agencies have changed their mission and purview."

For Clyne "most worrisome, are the administration's efforts to have CONGREGATIONS PLACE THEMSELVES IN THE SERVICE OF GOVERNMENT AS RECRUITERS FOR THE WELFARE STATE" and “this approach is a marked departure from the original purpose of the White House faith-based initiative.   Launched at the outset of President George W. Bush's first term, the initiative was largely intended to allow religious entities to compete on an equal footing with secular ones for grants to deliver social services.   When it came to treating addicts, rehabilitating prisoners, mentoring children, sheltering the homeless, and, yes, feeding the hungry, the Bush administration argued that faith-based organizations often had better records of efficiency and compassion than government programs.  But rather than reducing the public's dependence on government-run programs by empowering faith-based organizations, the Obama White House seems to view churches, synagogues, and so on, as tools to INCREASE reliance on programs designed in Washington."  Another "stealth" method for Obama to use to increase federal dependency in the USA citizenry.

Just another example of the Obama “perversion”, or “re-definition” of a federal system already in place, to change its direction to conform to the “Obama agenda”.

"They're turning this on its head," said Rev. Richard Land, who handles public policy for the Southern Baptist Convention.  The wisdom of the original faith-based initiative -- about which he was initially skeptical, Land explains -- was "to have people who live in a zip code making the decisions about what are the best ways to alleviate the problem in that zip code," rather than being pushed to follow some federal initiative.  Under the Obama administration’s perversion of the faith based initiative, Land said, "the White House dictates what your priorities should be."

It appears that Obama AGENDA POLITICAL STRATEGISTS IN THE WHITE HOUSE are mindful of the demographics which "serve the President's electoral interests" in this faith-based program.   Moreover, is it ever a good "idea for churches to provide platforms for politician - or First Ladies", no matter which political party?

And, most troubling, "increased dependence on government ultimately services the interests of the party that represents big government,  " Leading us farther down the road to less independence and decision-making.

 So here's the mix: greater government interference coupled with possible Muslim Brotherhood influence even though the Muslim Brotherhood "is one of the MOST DANGEROUS ISLAMIC GROUPS IN THE WORLD TODAY."

Is this an accident, or a tried and true recipe for disaster?