Thursday, March 29, 2012

Why Obama's Wife-less Travel?

Is this why President Obama goes to Muslim countries Wife-less?

Sheppard Smith, Fox News.

"If you check President Obama's last trip over-seas, his wife left just after their visit to France .  She has yet to accompany him to any Arab country for an "OFFICIAL" visit.  Think about it.  Why is Michelle returning to the states when 'official' trips to foreign countries generally include the First Lady."

Here's one unknown source thought on the matter.

“While in a Blockbuster renting videos I came across a video called "Obama". There were two men standing next to me and we talked about President Obama.  These guys were Arabs, so I asked them why they thought Michelle Obama headed home following the President's recent visit to France instead of traveling on to Saudi Arabia and Turkey with her husband.  They told me she could not go to Saudi Arabia, Turkey or Iraq.  I said "Why not, Laura Bush went to Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Dubai."  They said that Obama is a Muslim and therefore he is not allowed to bring his wife into countries that adhere to Sharia Law for official, political visits.”

Two points of interest here:

1)  I thought it interesting that two American Arabs at Blockbuster believe that our President is a Muslim, who follows a strict Islamic creed.

2)  They also said that's the reason he bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia.  It was a signal to the Muslim world, acknowledging his religion.

For further consideration, here is a response from Dr. Jim Murk, a Middle Eastern Scholar and expert on Islam.  This is his explanation of what the Arab American's were saying.

"An orthodox Muslim man would never take his wife on a politically oriented trip to any nation which practices Sharia law, particularly Saudi Arabia where the Wahhabi sect is dominant.  This is true and it is why Obama left Michelle in Europe.  She will stay home when he visits Arab countries.  He knows Muslim protocol;  this includes, bowing to the Saudi King.  Obama is regarded as a Muslim in the Arab world, because he was born to a Muslim father;  he acknowledged his Muslim faith with an "accidental" slip of the tongue in an interview with George Stephanopoulus."

VIDEO 1 of 2
 In the above video, Obama speaks glowingly about Islamic accomplishments and contributions to the world over the centuries.  Compare what he said, with the TRUTH!

 "Note that he downplays his involvement with Christianity, by not publicly joining a Christian church in D.C.  And only occasionally attending the chapel for services at Camp David .  He also played down the fact that America is a Christian country and said, unbelievably, that it was one of the largest Muslim nations in the world, which is nonsense.  He has publicly taken the side of the Palestinians in the conflict with Israel and he ignored the National Day of Prayer, something no other President has ever done.  He is bad news!  He conceals his true faith to the detriment of the American people."
--- Jim Murk, Doctor of Philosophy in Middle Eastern Culture & Religion.
VIDEO 2 of 2

ACTIONS speak louder than words. Here is another interesting item regarding Sharia Law.  Why has Barack Hussein Obama insisted that the U.S. Attorney General hold the trials of the 911 Muslim Terrorists in Civilian Courts as Common Criminals instead of as Terrorists who attacked the United States of America?  If the Muslim Terrorists are tried in Military Tribunals, convicted and sentenced to death, by LAW, Barack Hussein Obama, as President of the United States, would be required to sign their death warrants.  He would not be required to sign the death warrants if they are sentenced to death by a Civilian Court.  Recently, Muslim Jihadist, Army Major Hassan slaughtered non-Muslim, soldiers at Ft. Hood, Texas rather than go to Afghanistan and be a part of anything that could lead to the deaths of fellow Muslims.  He stated that Muslims “could not and should not kill fellow Muslims.”  Is the motive for Barack Hussein Obama's insistence on civilian trials, to make sure he doesn't have to sign the death warrants for the Muslim Terrorists?  Why would he, as President of the United States, not sign the death warrants for Muslim Terrorists who attacked the United States and murdered over 3,000 U. S. Citizens on 9/11?  Could it be that he is a Muslim and so is FORBIDDEN by his RELIGION to authorize the execution of Muslims?
Obama's Older brother Malik with FAMILY Picture

Think about that!  Open your eyes, ears and mind to who the President is, how he behaves and what he is doing!  Actions speak louder than teleprompter-writing.  I have said many times that Obama is not making mistakes; he is doing nothing “by accident”.  All of his actions are INTENTENTIONAL, and if you don’t understand WHY he did something, it is because you do not understand his agenda for AMERICA!

Obama's older half-brother Malik tells the Jewish people in the Jerusalem Post "Not to worry" that if his brother is elected American president he will "be a good President for the Jewish people, DESPITE HIS MUSLIM BACKGROUND".  Malik Obama is a Luo activist and a militant Muslim who argues that the black man must "liberate himself from the poisoning influences of the European culture".

Monday, March 26, 2012

Imposter in the White House?

Is There An Imposter In The White House? An Excerpt from "Hope Is Not A Strategy" -- By D.M. Lukas and John L. Mariotti

There is something very wrong when the sitting president refuses to divulge huge pieces of information about his background. What is he hiding? Maybe the “birthers” were a little extreme, but is there something wrong with this “manufactured candidate,” whose history remains sealed from public view? What is he hiding?

Could the “Hawaii birth certificate” be a forgery? Is there something much worse—like “sponsorship” by an unnamed special interest? I don’t know. I do know that the man in the White House now is an imposter. The only question is which kind of an imposter: an incompetent “pretender” or a genuine phony, a “Manchurian candidate,” who is a liberal, ½ black and ½ white, and an obvious Muslim sympathizer (despite claims of being a Christian—in clear conflict with his non-Christian behavior).

Will this campaign expose him as the imposter, and the pretender his behavior has revealed? Will it expose his hidden history and murky background. We know about his failures and mistakes.

For those who don’t, here is another in this series of revealing excerpts from HOPE IS NOT A STRATEGY: Leadership Lessons from the Obama Presidency. The book is now available on in paperback and Kindle versions. Other in e-book versions are available at

Excerpt from the chapter: Beware the Pretender:
…”No matter how many times President Obama refers to the “problems he inherited,” he has now been in office three years. Certainly many of the current problems can be traced back to events that happened during the eight years that Bush held the top office, and some can be traced back to even earlier presidencies—but far from all of them.

Many of the problems are newly created (or made worse), and Barack Obama owns them. Candidate Obama stepped up and essentially said, “I want the job, and everything that comes with it” by running for president. After three years in office, the problems now belong to him and his presidency. He caused them, made them worse, or didn’t solve them. Either way, they are his now.

…In leadership, you cannot “pretend” to be a leader. You either are—or you aren’t—a leader. One or the other will become apparent very quickly.

If you want the leadership job, you must step up and take full ownership of it. A “pretender” or “poser” is like an actor who has learned all the right lines, but has no idea what they mean. Once the script has been followed (or deviated from), the actor is clueless about what to do next. This is the job of the leader. Unfortunately, in this government, the “directors” often seem clueless, having learned in academia where results and wins/losses are theoretical, or in politics where success (at getting elected) is more a matter of rhetoric than results.
Video 1 of 5
If you are not ready for a position, or do not believe that you have what it takes to rise to the challenge (or clean up the mess even if you believe it is not your mess), then do not take the job. This was Barack Obama’s fundamental mistake. He grossly underestimated the difficulty of the position he was running for, and overestimated his preparedness to actually do the job. Just because he could “talk a good game” (thanks to a phalanx of speech writers and the omnipresent teleprompters) does not mean he actually knew what to do or how to do it. The presidency of the United States of America is not a place for heavy OJT (On-the Job-Training)….”
BillboTex COMMENT:  I disagree with the author's opinion that Obama "...grossly underestimated the difficulty of the position ...".  I believe that EVERYTHING that Obama is doing is INTENTIONAL, no mistake, no mis-calculation, no mis-step and only looks "flawed" when you are not aware of his agenda.  If you look at any Socialist, Communist, or Marxis tactics, you will clearly see the reasons for all of his decisions.  He studied under Cloward & Piven, Derrick Bell, began his Political career in the home of  '60s radical bomber Bill Ayers, follows tactics common to Saul Alinsky, SocialistUSA Party, CommunistUSA Party's Frank Marshall Davis, .  He created 37 czars, more than any other President, who are not subject to Congressional approval, one of his czars was forced out when his communist affilliations were made public, but even more, currently remain as his czars.  Yes his intention is to CHANGE AMERICA into a European style third world style Socialist welfare state.
Video 2 of 5
After the first three plus years of the presidency, it is painfully clear that Barack Obama was a “pretty face,” and “glib speaker” and a lightweight liberal politician with a community organizer/radical background. The American people should be outraged at this man’s behavior and even his candidacy. Why are they not? Because of the misinformation delivered by sympathetic liberal/mainstream media who loves his nonsensical form of governing.
Video 3 of 5
…”Obama’s perceived preparedness for the presidency is a terrible delusion, from which it is difficult to escape. Mistakes build upon each other and result in even more complex problems. Difficult problems that are mishandled become even more difficult to fix. When you have too little experience, lack substance (other than the words of your latest speech), then leading, managing and problem solving simply don’t happen. And that is what has occurred. When you compound the problem by surrounding your self with like-minded theorists, lacking in real-world experience, things become worse yet. The theoretical solutions to problems often don’t work due to the messiness of the real world—and the reasons are almost unfathomable to these rookie executive/politicians. …”
Video 4 of 5
What should Americans think about this “imposter?” Will he divulge his true background so we can all see who he is and where he came from—really? If not, is this just a man who should never have been sworn into the office of President in the first place, and who has crippled Americans miserably during his term?

Will we continue to believe his misstatements (the politically correct term for lies)? Can he simply use the media to “erase and forget the past three years of misery and mis-steps?” Or will we learn from his imperialistic behavior and terrible results and throw him out in November?
Video 5 of 5
That is what why we wrote HOPE IS NOT A STRATEGY: Leadership Lessons from the Obama Presidency. To learn more go to: and sign up—and go to and buy the book—and see for yourself! There are thirty chapters that reveal what was behind Barack Obama’s mistakes, failures and lack of leadership.
AnonymousMar 25, 2012 06:02 PM
why is the Forbes article being scrubbed from internet?

UPDATE: 3/27/2012    Federal Immigration and Naturalization Service Consular document  found of birth of a child in Kenya in 1961, to an American mother - The implicit evidence mounts!  NOBAMA 2012

UPDATE:  Late 3/27/2012   Hawaii records official now swears affidavit  ---------------    There IS NO OBAMA HAWAIIAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE - vote NOBAMA 2012!

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

SCOTUS - Kagan ObamaCare Recusal

Elena Kagan MUST recuse herself or be disqualified from the Supreme Court case regarding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare).

As Solicitor General, Kagan was involved in the deliberative process regarding the defense of ObamaCare. This gives her access to information that may be protected by legal privilege. This alone creates a conflict of interest, never mind the fact that she celebrated ObamaCare's passage in an email exchange, the day it passed, with a subject line “fingers and toes crossed today!” with Lawrence Tribe -- Clearly indicating that both Tribe and Kagan were discussing with great anticipation and support, the imminent passage of ObamaCare.  Tribe, is a liberal Harvard law professor, and former teacher and mentor of Obama.  Tribe was serving at that time in a specially created capacity in the Department of Justice called “Senior Counsel for Access to Justice.

Kagan e-mailed Tribe at 11:39 am “I hear they have the votes, Larry!!  Simply amazing.”  Exclamation points are hers.

Tribe replied late that afternoon “So health care is basically done!  Remarkable.   And with the Stupak group accepting the magic of what amounts to a signing statement on steroids!”  Exclamation point is his, seeming to show his glee about the fast-one they had just pulled on Stupak and other pro-life Democrats.

The Obama team managed to bury the evidence of this "smoking gun" for months.  A thorough vetting of Kagan's role in ObamaCare could have forced her to pledge to recuse herself from this case in order to get confirmed.

Kagan -- as Solicitor General -- had a rooting interest in the passage of ObamaCare.  She supported the bill and seemed joyful at the bill's passage.  And as the Judicial Crisis Network (JCN) has carefully documented, Kagan engaged her department in the strategy to defend ObamaCare in court “before [ObamaCare] had even been signed into law.”  JCN also tracks how Kagan was involved in the “deliberative process” for her office’s legal defense of ObamaCare.

It is clear that Kagan's "impartiality might REASONABLY be questioned," because of her PERSONAL investment in the deliberative process of crafting a defense for ObamaCare, and therefore, per federal law, she must be disqualified from this case.

That is how we the people are guaranteed an impartial deliberation by the Supreme Court, of the Constitutionality of the laws of our country, America.

For Judge Kagan to do otherwise, and inject her deliberations into a setting which DEMANDS her recusal, would be UNCONSCIONABLE and illegal.

UPDATE:  Fax re-sent to ALL recipients 3/27/2012

UPDATE:  Fax re-sent to ALL recipients 3/30/2012

UPDATE:  Fax re-sent to ALL recipients 4/1/2012

UPDATE:  Fax re-sent to ALL recipients 4/9/2012

UPDATE:  Fax re-sent to ALL recipients 4/14/2012

This fax was sent to POTUS, Gov. Christie, GOP Candidates Gingrich, Romney, Santorum, Paul, Senators Issa, Cornyn, Hutchinson, Rubio, Snowe, McConnell, Reid, Feinstein, Reed, Murray, Boxer, Tester, Kyl, Representatives Boehner, Cantor, Ryan, DeMint, Poe, Rand Paul, Levin, Pelosi, New first-term House Republicans West, Berg, Noem, Crawford, Gosar, Benishek, Nunnelee, Guinta, McKinley, Griffin, Huizenga, Ellmers, Rigell, Womack, Runyan, Heck, Kelly, Herrera, Gardner, Palazzo, Nugent, Lankford, McCarthy, and various Conservative and Liberal media outlets. 

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Tocqueville NAILS Obama

It is AMAZING how much French political philosopher Alexis de Tocqueville knew about America from a single visit in the early 1800’s!  Here are some of his quotes:

“The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.”
-- de Tocqueville Democracy In America

“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years.”
-- de Tocqueville

“America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.”
-- de Tocqueville

“There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle.”
-- de Tocqueville

“Americans are so enamored of equality, they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.”
-- de Tocqueville

“Democracy extends the sphere of individual freedom, socialism restricts it. Democracy attaches all possible value to each man; socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number. Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word: equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude.”
-- de Tocqueville

“What good does it do me, after all, if an ever-watchful authority keeps an eye out to ensure that my pleasures will be tranquil and races ahead of me to ward off all danger, sparing me the need even to think about such things, if that authority, even as it removes the smallest thorns from my path, is also absolute master of my liberty and my life; if it monopolizes vitality and existence to such a degree that when it languishes, everything around it must also languish; when it sleeps, everything must also sleep; and when it dies, everything must also perish? ”
-- de Tocqueville

“We can state with conviction, therefore, that a man's support for absolute government is in direct proportion to the contempt he feels for his country.”
-- de Tocqueville

“No protracted war can fail to endanger the freedom of a democratic country”
-- de Tocqueville

“I have always thought that in revolutions, especially democratic revolutions, madmen, not those so called by courtesy, but genuine madmen, have played a very considerable political part. One thing is certain, and that is that a condition of semi-madness is not unbecoming at such times, and often even leads to success.”
-- de Tocqueville

Vote GOP primary winner in 2012 to RESTORE America

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Fax - Defund ALL ACORN Affilliates NOW

ACORN Voter Fraud FAX
RE: ACORN affilliates prepare for 2012 VOTER FRAUD!

I am writing to respectfully demand that you support Senator Darrell Issa's push to launch a formal investigation into ACORN's criminal activities.  Senator Darrell Issa is demanding a formal investigation into the CRIMINAL fundraising schemes that ACORN's New York front group used to raise cash for the Occupy Wall Street protestors.
The House Oversight Committee Chairman and leading investigator for the House of Representatives said ACORN is "Engaged in fraud through its participation in the Occupy Wall Street protests. [And may have] solicited donations from union members under false pretenses and misappropriated funds to support the protestors."

VOTER FRAUD is the name of ACORN's game. They're just getting their feet wet in the Occupy Wall Street protests. Their main goal is to steal the 2012 elections by flooding polling booths with illegitimate voters.
Don't forget - ACORN was under investigation in 2009 for election fraud and related offenses in nearly 20 states, for crimes ranging from false voter registrations and illegal voting, to identity theft and records tampering, to using felons as registration workers.  There was enough proof that Congress passed the 2009 Defund ACORN Act, which banned federal funds to ACORN and was signed by President Obama.

Judicial Watch investigators recently discovered that the Obama Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has issued a $79,819 grant to the Affordable Housing Centers of America (AHCOA) — an offshoot of ACORN — in apparent violation of the 2009 DEFUND ACORN ACT funding ban passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama in 2009, which banned funding to ACORN “and any ACORN-related affiliates”.

ACORN  dropped the name after the 2009 Defund ACORN Act ban, and reorganized under dozens of different affiliates to restore their ability to steal federal funding through Obama, and use the stolen taxpayer’s money to steal the 2012 election for Obama, using their standard voter fraud tactics.
The official federal website, listing federal expenditures identifies the AHCOA organization receiving this grant as “ACORN Housing Corporation Inc.” and even lists ACORN’s New Orleans, Louisiana, address.  Moreover AHCOA maintains the same board of directors, executive director, and offices as its predecessor, ACORN Housing Corporation, Inc.  MAKE NO MISTAKE AHCOA IS ACORN and is a CLEAR violation of the funding ban.

Cease the unlawful funding immediately as required by federal law.

ACORN will stop at nothing to ensure that their previous employee and representing attorney -- and now our Community Organizer in Chief, Barack Obama is re-elected in 2012! We must defund ALL ACORN iterations - NOW!

This fax was sent to POTUS, Gov. Christie, GOP Candidates Gingrich, Romney, Santorum, Paul, Senators Issa, Cornyn, Hutchinson, Rubio, Snowe, McConnell, Reid, Feinstein, Reed, Murray, Boxer, Tester, Kyl, Representatives Boehner, Cantor, Ryan, DeMint, Poe, Rand Paul, Levin, Pelosi, New first-term House Republicans West, Berg, Noem, Crawford, Gosar, Benishek, Nunnelee, Guinta, McKinley, Griffin, Huizenga, Ellmers, Rigell, Womack, Runyan, Heck, Kelly, Herrera, Gardner, Palazzo, Nugent, Lankford, McCarthy, and various Conservative and Liberal media outlets.

Friday, March 2, 2012

Liberals Can't Re-Elect Obama - Only Conservatives can Do That

There is an interesting post on Voting American “Why ObamaWill Be Re-Elected in 2012”.  The original post was mistakenly attributed to the black economist Dr. Walter Williams.  But he did not author the article, so the REAL author remains anonymous.

The Voting American rates the anonymous article as credible, but because of what I see as “flaws” and a couple of “points not considered” in the original article, I am posting “Why Obama Can be UNSEATED in 2012”.

But to beat Obama, one thing must happen:  ALL Conservatives MUST vote for the GOP primary winner, including what I have named as the “ANGRY” Conservatives, which I have defined as those Conservatives who claim to be Conservatives, HATE MOST of the GOP candidates, want to “beat up” Obama as opposed to most Conservatives who want to BEAT Obama, and who UNREALISTICALLY expect perfection in the GOP Party and GOP candidates.

This failure of “angry” Conservatives to vote for the GOP primary winner, if it amounts to as little as 4% to 6% of the TOTAL Conservative votes cast in the general election, will re-elect Obama.

I am reproducing the original, anonymous article below with my comments on the flawed reasoning addended to the article.
And then below the original, anonymous article I will post my article “Why Obama Can Be UNSEATED in 2012”.

Voting American post “Why Obama Will Be Re-Elected in 2012”
By Anonymous

"Can Obama be defeated in 2012?
No, he can’t."

"I am going on record as saying that Barrack Obama will win a second term.  The media won’t tell you this because a good election campaign war chest means hundreds of millions (or in Obama’s case, billions) of dollars to the media in advertising."
BillboTex comment:  Obama’s war chest (maybe a BILLION) and MSM bias are powerful tools – but both may be neutralized by OBVIOUS UNTRUTH of their messages and OBVIOUS current dismal condition of our standard of living.

"But the truth is, there simply are no conditions under which Barack Obama can be defeated in 2012."
BillboTex comment:  This sounds like an Obama bumper sticker, but is neutralized by another Obama bumper sticker – CHOOSE EITHER ME …….OR AMERICA!  YOU CAN’T HAVE BOTH!

"The quality of the Republican candidate doesn’t matter.   Obama gets reelected.
Nine percent unemployment?  No problem.  Obama will win.
Gas prices moving toward five dollars a gallon?  He still wins.
The economy soars or goes into the gutter. Obama wins.
War in the Middle East?  He wins a second term."
BillboTex comment:  The first sentence is correct – WHOEVER is the GOP primary winner will beat Obama.  Everything that follows is wrong, and no justification is provided?  If gas prices are approaching $6/gal as expected, that alone will add 4% to 6% to the GOP candidate’s voters from Obama’s constituency, which is EXACTLY the number needed to unseat him.

"America’s role as the leading Superpower disappears? Just what he wants!
The U.S. government rushes toward bankruptcy, the dollar continues to sink on world markets and the price of daily goods and services soars due to inflation fueled by Obama’s extraordinary deficit spending? No matter. Obama wins handily.
Many will say, “You are crazy Williams. Don’t you understand how volatile politics can be when overall economic, government, and world conditions are declining?”  Sure I do."
BillboTex comment:  If you truly surely do know that, then your lack of reason that it doesn’t matter, reveals your sure knowledge that political volatility trumps election theft.

"And that’s why I know Obama will win.  The American people are notoriously ignorant of economics.  And economics is the key to why Obama should be defeated."
BillboTex comments:  Yes We the People are notoriously ignorant of economics, but we are POWERFULLY sensitive to our OUALITY of life, and because of the realization that no one is better off now than they were 4 years ago, that greatly reduces the need for INTRICATE ECONOMIC acumen.  Rasmussen poll TODAY finds 27% believe that GOVERNMENTAL MANAGEMENT is helping the economy.

"Even when Obama’s policies lead the nation to final ruin, the majority of the American people are going to believe the bait-and-switch tactics Obama and his supporters in the media will use to explain why it isn’t his fault.  After all, things were much worse than understood when he took office."
BillboTex comment:  If the American people are not believing it now (Obama’s low approval polls), why do you think the American people will believe it at the last minute time of the general election, when EVERY Obama position will be worse?

"Obama’s reelection is really a very, very simple math problem. Consider the following:

1)  Blacks will vote for Obama blindly.  Period.  Doesn’t matter what he does.  It’s a race thing.  He’s one of us.  That’s why the media destroyed Herman Cain so handily.  Too big a threat."
BillboTex comment:  Yes the majority of Black voters will vote Obama – but not at 2008 level.  He will not get 95% of the 13% total black voters, as he did in 2008.  He will lose possibly 10% of that 95% because National unemployment is at 8.3% while Black unemployment is greater than 16%, and BOTH figures will be worse at the time of the general election.

"2)  College educated women will vote for Obama.  Though they will be offended by this, they swoon at his oratory.  It’s really not more complex than that."
BillboTex comment:  The “swooning” among women has abated.  That’s one of the reasons for Obama current approval rating below 50%, at 48%.

"3)  Liberals will vote for Obama.  He is their great hope."
BillboTex comment:  In 2010 41% of voters self-identified themselves as Conservatives, and 21% self-identified themselves as Liberals.  Large numbers of Obama’s constituency now see Obama’s HOPE, as only HYPE!  Obama’s approval polls are 48% and only ONE prior President – G.W.Bush has won an election with a rating below 50% (Bush won with 49% in 2004).

"4)  Democrats will vote for Obama.  He is the leader of their party and his coat tails will carry them to victory nationwide."
BillboTex comment:  21% of DEMs have left the DEMParty in the three and a half years since Obama has been in office.
"5)  Hispanics will vote for Obama.  He is the path to citizenship for those who are here illegally and Hispanic leaders recognize the political clout they carry in the Democratic Party."
BillboTex comment:  There IS a Latino landslide.  But it is a landslide AWAYfrom Obama  - Lying about it will NOT make it come true!

"6)  Union members will vote overwhelmingly for Obama.  He is their key to money and power in business, state and local politics."
BillboTex comment:  Corrupt Unions will vote for those who will secretly line their pockets.

"7)  Big Business will support Obama.  They already have.  He has almost $1 Billion dollars in his reelection purse gained largely from his connections with Big Business and is gaining more every day.  Big Business loves Obama because he gives them access to taxpayer money so long as they support his social and political agenda."
BillboTex comment:  Obama is losing support/contributions from several sectors of big business as they realize the destructive effects of his agenda on THEIR business.

8)  The media love him.  They may attack the people who work for him, but they love him.  After all, to not love him would be racist.
BillboTex comment:  Most fair minded voters are aware of the main stream media's Obama bias.

9)  Most other minorities and special interest groups will vote for him.  Oddly, the overwhelming majority of Jews and Muslims will support him because they won’t vote Republican.  American Indians will support him.  Homosexuals tend to vote Democratic.  And lastly…
BillboTex comments:  The Jewish vote has been the largest specialty interest constituency, but Obama's transparent anti Semitism and bias towards Islam has caused a DRAMATIC loss of their support.

10)  Approximately half of independents will vote for Obama.  And he doesn’t need anywhere near that number because he has all of the groups previously mentioned.  The President will win an overwhelming victory in 2012.
BillboTex comment:  Obama’s Independent support is rapidly dropping.


It’s believed the United States is now somewhere between the “complacency and apathy” phase of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation’s population already having reached the “governmental dependency” phase.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegals – and they vote – then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.

 American Obituary?

In 1887 Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh , had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior:

"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government.
A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.  From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the
most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse over loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a dictatorship."

"The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years.

During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:

From bondage to spiritual faith;
From spiritual faith to great courage;
From courage to liberty;
From liberty to abundance;
From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy;
From apathy to dependence;
From dependence back into bondage."

The Obituary follows:

Born 1776, Died 2012
It doesn't hurt to read this several times.

Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul , Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the last Presidential election:

Number of States won by:  Obama: 19 McCain: 29
Square miles of land won by:  Obama: 580,000 McCain: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by:  Obama: 127 million McCain: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:  Obama: 13.2 McCain: 2.1

Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory McCain won was
mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.

Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income
tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."

Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
invaders called illegals - and they vote - then we can say goodbye to the
USA in fewer than five years.

This is truly scary!

Of course we are not a democracy, we are a Constitutional Republic.  Someone should point this out to Obama.  Of course we know he and too many others pay little attention to The Constitution.  There couldn't be more at stake than on Nov 6, 2012.

"Fathom the hypocrisy of a Government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured ... but does not require proof of citizenship."

BILLBOTEX Blog-A-Sphere post:  “Why Obama Can Be UNSEATED in 2012”
By BillboTex

Can Obama be UNSEATED in 2012?
Yes, he can.

In the original, anonymous article above, I added my addenda.  But now I would like to present what the anonymous arthor seems to have overlooked.

LIBERALS CANNOT RE-ELECT OBAMA.  His criminal agenda to TRANSFORM America into a Socialist, Marxist, third world, European style welfare state is clear to most citizens by now, in the United States.  His only constituents now are the uninformed voters, radicals, those who benefit from welfare handouts, and political cronyism.

The people with the power to re-elect Obama are the “angry” Conservatives that I defined above.  The ONLY chance to unseat Obama in 2012 is for ALL Conservatives and “angry” Conservatives to vote for the GOP primary winner in 2012.

In 2012, if a Conservative or an “angry” Conservative doesn’t vote for the GOP primary winner, that’s one less vote for the ONLY person with a chance to unseat Obama, so places Obama up by one vote.

In 2012, if a Conservative or “angry” Conservative votes for a third party candidate, they are casting a vote for someone who cannot possibly win against Obama, as the MOST they could expect to receive is 9% to 22% of the total votes, so that’s one less vote for the GOP primary winner who is the ONLY person with a chance to unseat Obama, so places Obama up by another vote.

In 2012, if a Conservative or “angry” Conservative “writes in” a vote, they are casting a vote again, for someone who cannot win against Obama, and who could only wind up with 4% to 8% of the total votes, so that’s one less vote for the GOP primary winner who is the ONLY person with a chance to unseat Obama, so places Obama up by another vote.

Vote your heart in 2016 if Obama is not in office, but in 2012 you MUST vote the GOP primary winner for the ONLY chance to defeat Obama.

If the “angry” Conservatives follow this plan, we can defeat Obama by 4% to 6% in 2012.  If the “angry” Conservatives are consumed by their anger and the futile search for some PERFECT candidate, then Obama will be re-elected to a second term of office, and by adding additional non-essential federal worker voters (possibly an additional 500,000), more welfare recipient voters (possibly an additional 6 million), 11 million illegal alien voters,  a growing base of Muslim voters (3 million,and rapidly growing), a growing base of Union voters, a growing base of college loan recipients, and additional fraudulent voters, Obama will reach a stabile voter base of over 54%, which will allow him to become a permanent American dictator if that is his goal.