Statistics Don't Lie, But Politicians Do

There are actually two messages here.

The 1st is very interesting and shows the quality of healthcare we can expect if we are unable to stop ObamaCare.  Remember that as we age, we will ALL come under the ABSENCE of care under ObamaCare unless we repeal it.  But the 2nd is absolutely astounding - and explains a lot about Obama's agenda to destroy the American economy.

A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization.

REMEMBER THAT AMERICA DOES NOT HAVE SOCIALIZED MEDICINE  (OBAMACARE) -  YET!  BUT ENGLAND BEGAN IN 1911, AND CANADA  BEGAN IN 1912!

        Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years  after diagnosis:

        U.S.                  65%
        England            46%
        Canada            42%

        Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:

        U.S.                  93%
        England            15%
        Canada            43%

        Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it  within six months:

        U.S.                  90%
        England            15%
        Canada            43%

        Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:

        U.S.                  77%
        England            40%
        Canada            43%

        Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:
        

        U.S.                  71
        England            14
        Canada            18

        Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in "excellent health":

        U.S.                  12%
        England            2%
        Canada            6%
        And now for the last statistic:


        National Health Insurance?

        U.S.                   NO
        England          YES
        Canada            YES

STILL INTERESTED IN OBAMACARE - GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED, EUROPEAN STYLE SOCIALIZED MEDICINE?

        Check this last set of statistics, which plainly show the relationship between sucess of POTUS in promoting a thriving economy, as it relates to POTUS' prior business experience and of his cabinet.

        The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet. 

        You know what the private business sector is: a  real-life business, not a government job.  Here are the percentages.

        T. Roosevelt................... 38%
        Taft................................... 40%
        Wilson..............................  52%
        Harding........................... 49%
        Coolidge......................... 48%
        Hoover............................. 42%
        F. Roosevelt................... 50%

        Truman............................ 50%
        Eisenhower.................... 57%
        Kennedy......................... 30%
        Johnson.......................... 47%
        Nixon............................... 53%
        Ford.................................. 42%
        Carter............................... 32%
        Reagan............................ 56%
        GH Bush......................... 51%
        Clinton............................. 39%
        GW Bush......................... 55%

        Obama..................... 8%

        This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:  only 8% of them have ever worked in private business!

        That's right!  Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents!   And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business?  These are the people trying to tell us how our economy should run in order to promote job creation

        Note that the only Presidents below 33 1/3 % were ALL Democrats.

        How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when he's never worked for one?  Or about jobs when he has never really had one? 

        And when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers?  They've spent most of their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs or as "community organizers." They should have been in an employment line.

        You will NEVER see these facts in the main stream media.

       "One of the penalties of not participating in politics is that you will be
        governed by your inferiors."  Plato