Malignant Narcissist Obama?

Today I believe we have reached a point with this administration which could become the point of CRITICAL MASS.  Today started what I think could possibly become the FINAL step in Obama's agenda to gain a complete DICTATORSHIP over the United States of America.

He is accomplishing this by implementing gradual steps to completely eliminate any responsibility of the Presidency, to the American Constitution, and I believe this could become the last step in that goal.

This final step looks like a building Obama attempt to allow the President of the United States (POTUS), to ignore the constitutional necessity of congressional APPROVAL for raising the debt ceiling, and allow him to unilaterally raise the ceiling by "Executive Order".  If this turns into the final step, then from this point on, the POTUS is a dictator without any of the intended Constitutional checks & balances instituted to prevent his becoming a dictator.

When this happens, the only options to the American people are tax revolt (cut off the economic head of the beast), and revolution.

This possibly final step today was spoken against, by Texas Senator John Cronyn:   Sen. Cornyn warned President Obama on Sunday to not even consider interpreting the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment to bypass Congress and raise the debt limit without it's approval.  "That's crazy talk.  Its not acceptable for Congress and the President to not do their job, and to say somehow the President has the authority then to basically do this by himself."  Cornyn (REP-Texas), a former judge on the Texas Supreme Court, told "Fox News Sunday".

The proposal that Obama re-interpret Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment to justify raising the RECORD $14.3 trillion debt limit has been gaining traction in Democratic circles since possibly outgoing Treasury Secretary, & income tax violator, Tim Geithner told reporters last May that in his opinion the Constitution's language could support the President's raising the national debt limit without congressional approval.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and others on Capitol Hill reportedly acknowledged that the idea is percolating, and had been presented to the president.  "It's certainly worth exploring. I think it needs a little more exploration and study," he said during a conference call with reporters held Friday.

Without addressing efforts to invoke the Constitution, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., said Sunday the president and congressional negotiators shouldn't even be discussing a debt deal privately.  "Congress is the constitutional place for this to be decided," said Sessions, who is the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee. 

Asked during a press conference Wednesday whether the debt limit was constitutional, the president glossed over the question, saying, "I'm not a Supreme Court justice, so I'm not going to put my constitutional law professor hat on here."

Read more:  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/03/cornyn-obama-bypassing-congress-on-debit-limit-is-crazy-talk/#ixzz1R6ZaaHlg

If the Obama plan works, and we allow him the right "not to be questioned" and to unilaterally raise the debt ceiling of the United Stated of America without confirming vote by the US Congress, we will then be operating as a dictatorship for the first time since the birth of out country!  Is this the change we can believe in?

Obama's plan best works slowly.  The same way the lobster doesn't struggle in the pot so long as the temperature goes up slowly.  As you see from above Geithner brought up the "no questions" concept in relation to raising the nation's debt ceiling, three months ago.

Other occasions where Obama started chipping away at the REQUIREMENT of Congressional approval are:

The forged birth certificate, even though McCain was REQUIRED to provide his birth certificate.

Placing American troops under the command of UN authorities, and into combat in Libya without Congressional approval, nor threat to the United States from Libya.  CANDIDATE Obama made several statements about his opinion AGAINST PRESIDENT BUSH in  an interview with the Boston Globe:

Q:  In what circumstances would the President have Constitutional authority to bomb Iran without seeking a use-of-force authorization from Congress?

A:  The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.  In instances of self-defense, the President would be within his Constitutional authority to act before advising Congress or seeking it's consent.  History has shown us time and time again, however, that military action is most successful when it is authorized and supported by the legislative branch.  It is always preferable to have the informed consent of Congress prior to any military action.As for the specific question about bombing suspected nuclear sites, I recently intro taken by the United States against Iran must be explicitly authorized by Congress.duced S.J.Res.23, which states in part that "any offensive military action taken by the United States against Iran must be explicitly authorized by Congress.

     Source:  Boston Globe question on Executive Power Dec 20, 2007

Q:  Can the President disregard a congressional statute limiting the deployment of troops - either by capping the number of troops, or by setting minimum home-stays between deployments?

A:  No, the President does not have that power.  To date, several Congresses have imposed limitations on the number of US troops deployed in a given situation.  As President, I will not assert a constitutional authority to deploy troops in a manner contrary to an expressed limit imposed Congress and adopted into law.

         SOURCE: Boston Globe question on Executive Power Dec 20, 2007

I am sure there are other examples of Obama's using small steps to ignore REQUIRED Congressional approval for POTUS actions.  If you are aware of any, please leave a comment.

If he gets away with this illegal debt ceiling takeover without congressional approval, I fear it might become the final nail in the coffin of transfer of the US into a dictatorship.  Once we allow that to happen, Obama could become dictator for an indefinite term (no longer needing congressional approval for any law he wants to institute).

WHAT CAN WE DO?

We can recognize that the Administration is encouraging blatantly unconstitutional, if not criminal, actions. Two hundred and thirty years of law is being subverted by a Marxist socialist named Barack Obama.

“We the people” can take action by vowing not to buy vehicles from Fiat/Chrysler and to avoid doing business with those concerns which profited from the "bail-out" travesty of justice. Ditto with General Motors … or Government Motors as it is now called.

We can also continue legislating restrictions on unions and their ability to influence elections and the selection of politicians. This has gone way beyond monopolistic practices, it is now bordering on subverting the Constitution of the United States.

We can start considering a grass roots movement to demand that Barack Obama produce documents proving that he is eligible to be the President of the United States.

We can continue to promote and contribute to grass roots movements to pressure elected officials to investigate Barack Obama and draft articles of impeachment citing massive self-dealing, bypassing REQUIRED Congressional approval, and other corruption involving trillions of dollars.

We can let our Senators know that we will not accept activist judges and that there will be consequences for their actions when they come up for reelection.

And we need to let our elected officials on all levels know that we are serious about not reelecting any incumbents.

IF WE FAIL, THIS COULD BE THE DEATH OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS WE KNOW IT

Criminal Forgery - class B Felony Impeachable Offense

Article By Jerome R. Corsi
on WND


This is the first of three articles on the criminal complaint that scanner-expert Doug Vogt filed last week with the FBI.
An international expert on scanners and document-imaging software filed a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI, charging that the long-form birth certificate released by the White House is criminally fraudulent.

"What the Obama administration released is a PDF image that they are trying to pass off as a Certificate of Live Birth Long Form printed on green security paper by the Hawaiian Health Department," Doug Vogt writes, "but this form is a created forgery."
Get the inside details on what could be the most serious constitutional crisis in modern history, in "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to be President," autographed by the author!

Vogt's criminal complaint asserts: "I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011, is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs, and the creation of this forgery of a public document constitutes a class B felony in Hawaii and multiple violations under U.S. Code section Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47,Sec.1028, and therefore an impeachable offense."

When the Obama birth certificate "forgery" comes to the public's attention, Vogt continues, "It will surpass all previous scandals including the Watergate scandal of the Nixon administration."
Since 1993, Vogt has owned Archive Index Systems Inc., in Bellevue, Wash., a company that sells a wide variety of document scanners worldwide and develops document imaging software.  Before that, Vogt owned Nova Typesetting for 11 years.

Curved and non-curved lines of type

Vogt says that the curved surface on the left margin of the Obama birth certificate suggests the county employee who did the original scanning of the document did not take the individual page out of the binder.
"The result is that all the pages in that book display a parallax distorted image of the lines and type," he says.  He claims, however, that the information typed into the form does not curve like the printed text on the form itself.

As seen in Figure 1 below, the word "Sex" on the printed form curves into the binder, while the typed word "Male" does not, Vogt argues.

Vogt observes that the word "Sex" printed on the form slants more to the left than the typed-in word "Male" below it.
He claims to have found another parallax problem in line 6c, "Name of Hospital or Institution."

The word "Name" printed on the form and the lines above and below drop down two pixels while the typed-in hospital name, "Kapiolani," does not, he says.
"The conclusion you must come to is that the typed-in form was superimposed over an existing original Certificate of Live Birth form," Vogt writes.
Vogt contends that the forger placed the typed-in text over the printed copy, creating a composite from a variety of original birth certificate forms.
"In fact, since I found some of the form headings scanned in as binary and grayscale, the form itself is a composite but the person who created it did not flatten the image of the blank form and save it as one file before they started placing the typewriter text on the composite form," he says. "The individual(s) who perpetrated this forgery could not evidently find a blank form in the clerk's imaging database, so they were forced to clean up existing forms and overlay the typewriter type we see here."

'Halo'

A "white-halo effect" around some of the printed and typed-in letters on the form convinced Vogt that the document was a forgery.
If the birth certificate were a scan, as the White House maintained, it should have been a grayscale image in which no haloing effect would be visible, he reasons.
Vogt displays the figure below from the document released by the White House, demonstrating the white-halo effect:

He then compares the above example to a grayscale scan in which there is no halo effect:

The next image is a color scan in which there is no halo effect, with the green color of the security paper touching the edge of the type:

The figure below is a black-and-white binary image:

Vogt's argument is that a grayscale scan or a color image scan, as seen above, can be converted to a black-and-white binary image.
However, the presence of grayscale and binary images on the same scan is a clear indication of document manipulation, he contends.
"The important thing to remember is that you cannot have grayscale and binary on the same scan unless the image is a composite," Vogt argues. "This means that different components of the whole image are made up of smaller parts."

What produced the white-halo effect?

"We know that all the original Certificates of Live Birth were microfilmed because we can see the Nordyke certificate (below) was microfilmed," he explains. "Then, sometime after 2004, the paper original copies, in post binder books, were scanned using a commercial document scanner with a flat bed, scanned as grayscale images."

Copy of microfilmed original long-form birth certificate of Susan Nordyke, born in Honolulu the day after Obama's reported birthdate.
Vogt concludes that the forger was forced to convert the microfilmed images of original birth certificates to grayscale, as seen below, before the originals could be used to form a composite.

Susan Nordyke microfilmed birth certificate converted to grayscale

Next, Vogt says, the forger converted the grayscale converted image to a binary image and placed it onto a background form image.
"The problem was that there were still image values for the pixels around the placed type," Vogt observes, "so when he/she placed the type image over the background and instructed the program to bring the type "forward" it blanked out the background image, hence the haloing effect around the type."

'Another smoking gun'

Finally, Vogt contends that the birth certificate released by the White House is loaded with binary and grayscale letters, "which is just another smoking gun that this form is a forgery."
Some of the lines and some of the boxes on the White House birth certificate were scanned using grayscale, but only some of the form headings and some of the letters were grayscale, he said.
Vogt produced the image below to illustrate his point:

Vogt explains:
You will notice the H and al in Hospital, and I in Institution.  If and again the h and l in hospital were grayscale images, but the rest of the line is binary. The typewriter line below was scanned in as a binary image. I can also tell you for certainty that the form type was scanned in at a lower resolution (?200 dpi). This is because of the size of the pixels on the letters were such that the openings on the a and s on the first line are not visible and filled in. This may also further indicate that forger took some of the type images from the microfilmed copies.
As another example of grayscale and binary type on the same line, Vogt selected the name "BARACK" from the form's box "1a," as show below:

"For some reason the 'R' is a grayscale image and the rest is binary," he writes. "That means the 'R' was originally on the form and the rest was not until it was added."

Vogt asks why the forger would leave some grayscale images in the form and not just erase the whole form.
He answer is that the forger needed to leave the grayscale images to re-establish the baseline of the type in order to place the superimposed binary type properly, in line with the other typing on the form.

"This also told me that the forger was an experienced graphic artist," Vogt concludes.

Another example was the birth certificate number itself, as seen below:

"This is just another example of a cut and paste job," Vogt noted. "It also means we do not know what therealbirth certificate number is, if there even is one."

Vogt's verdict

Vogt concludes that the Obama birth certificate document released by the White House on April 27 is an "outrageous and obvious" fraud.  "You could truly call this a Frankenstein Certificate of Live Birth," he says in summary.

"It is a logical conclusion," he says, "that since President Barack Obama felt it necessary to have a Certificate of Live Birth forged for himself then we must conclude that there is in fact no birth certificate in Hawaii and therefore he was not born inside the United States, as the Constitution requires, and he knew it and others also knew it but wanted him in office for whatever reason."


Read more:Criminal complaint charges Obama birth record 'forged'http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=305705#ixzz1O4tB6A2z


UPDATE:  Here is the second of the three articles by Jerome R. Corsi on WND

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=306953