The U.S. Naturalization Act of 1790 – “And the children of
citizens of the United States that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits
of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall
not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United
States.” (Obama’s father was not a U.S.
citizen; rather, a British subject). The
Act was repealed in 1795, but not because of any dispute over the meaning of
“natural born citizen.”
Schneider v. Rusk, 377 U.S. 163 (1964): “We start from the premise that the rights of
citizenship of the native-born (natural born) and of the naturalized person are
of the same dignity and are coextensive. The only difference drawn by the Constitution
is that only the “natural born” citizen is eligible to be President.
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393, 476-77 (1857); “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are
those born in the country of parents who are citizens.”
Minor v. Happersett (88 US 162 – 1874); “The Constitution does not in words say who
shall be natural-born citizens. Resort
must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which
the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all
children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves,
upon their birth, citizens also. These
were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or
foreigners. Some authorities go further
and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference
to the citizenship of their parents. As
to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.
John Bingham, framer of the 14th amendment: “Every human being born within the
jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any
foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural
born citizen.” (to any foreign
sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born
citizen.” (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (Mar. 9, 1866)
Emerich de Vattel’s “Law of Nations,” Book 1, Chap. 19,
Sect. 212 – “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the
country, of parents who are citizens.” (In
1814 the U.S. Supreme Court in THE VENUS relied upon and cited Vattel’s “Law of
Nations” as the authority in determining the citizenship of a “domicil”. See U.S. Supreme Court, THE VENUS, 12 U.S. 253
and The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 (1814). The Law of nations is mentioned in Art. 1,
Sect. 8, Clause 10 of the Constitution.
Other References: Supreme Court and lower court decisions
defining “natural born citizen.” Shanks
v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242 (1830), Ex parte Reynolds, 20 F. Cas. 582 (C.C.W.D. Ark
1879), United States v. Ward, 42 F. 320 (1890); Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649
(1898), Ludlam, Executrix, & c., v. Ludlam, 26 N.Y. 356 (1863).
RESOLUTION 511 AFFIRMS
THAT DEMOCRATS KNEW
OBAMA WAS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
Resolution 511 was about vetting Sen. John McCain to make
sure that he was a “natural born citizen.” No attempts were made to vet then Senator
Obama for the same thing. Obviously, the
vetting cleared McCain and Democrats were satisfied that he was eligible. But the Sponsors of Res. 511 (Senators
McCaskill, Coburn, Webb, Leahy, Clinton, Obama) affirmed that Obama is not a
natural born citizen. In the text of the
Resolution, it says, “Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American
citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it resolved, That John
Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘‘natural born Citizen’’ under Article II, Section 1,
of the Constitution of the United States.” “American citizens” is plural. BOTH of Obama’s parents had to be U.S.
citizens for their son to be eligible. His
father never was a U.S. citizen. During
one of the hearings, even Sen. Patrick Leahy affirmed this when he said,
“Because he (McCain) was born to American citizens, there is no doubt in my
mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen.” By recognizing that both parents must be U.S.
citizens for their child to be a natural born citizen, they acknowledged that
Barack Obama was not eligible because his father was not a U.S. citizen. Why wasn’t Sen. Obama vetted on the same
issue? Why did the DNC nominate a
candidate who wasn’t eligible?
EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT
OBAMA WAS NOT BORN IN THE U.S.
A. Barack Obama’s wife Michelle, during her
8-28-08 speech before LGBT delegates at the Democratic Convention in Denver,
remarked that Kenya is her husband’s "home country" And in a Dec. 2007 fund raiser she made in
Tampa, she referred to her husband as, “a Kenyan.”
B. In Oct. 2008, Barack Obama’s Kenyan
step-grandmother, Sarah Hussein, said twice in a telephone interview that she
was present when her grandson was delivered in the Coast Province Hospital in
Mombasa. Her story changed after she conferred with some families, but scroll down to paragraph 8 in BISHOP RON McRAE's AFFIDAVIT.
C. During the Mar. 25, 2010 session of
Parliament, Kenyan Minister of Lands, James Orengo, stated that Barack Obama
was BORN IN KENYA, and
during the Parliament Session of Nov. 5, 2008, ten members stood to recognize
the victory of Obama. Everyone of them
noted that the President is a “son of the soil, born in Kenya, roots in Kenya,
our brother of Kogelo.”
D. Former Senior Hawaii elections clerk, Tim
Adams, submitted a SWORN AFFIDAVIT stating that he was informed by his supervisors that no
long-form birth certificate exists for Obama in Hawaii.
E. No hospital has publicly announced that it is
the birth hospital of Obama. Kapi’olani
Hospital, where Obama claims to have been born, will not confirm or deny
Obama’s being born there, even with the knowledge that he has shown a document
to the world saying that Kapi’olani was where he was born. For a short period of time, Kapi’olani posted
on their website a Jan. 24, 2009 letter written by Obama saying that he was
born there. But it was taken down
shortly after and there is suspicion that it WASN'T WRITTEN BY OBAMA.
F.
Hawaiian
Gov. Neil Abercrombie conducted his own search for Obama’s birth certificate
and concluded it DOESN'T EXIST, just something “written down in the archives.” Yet, Obama showed the world his Hawaiian long
form birth certificate on Apr. 27, 2011 and of which former Director of the
Hawaii Department of Health, Chiyome Fukino, said was, “half typed and half
written.”
G. On April 27, 2011, Obama showed the world a
document stating that he was born in Hawaii. This document has come under examination by
several scanning and imaging experts, all who have concluded it is a FORGERY. To date, no official challanges have been made.
H. In July 2011, a subpoena for the release of
Obama’s official Hawaiian birth certificate was issued to the Director of the
Hawaii Department of Health, Loretta Fuddy. She was ordered to present it at the HDOH
offices to California Attorney Orly Taitz on Aug. 8, 2011. She failed to produce it and the District
Court of Hawaii has ordered Director Fuddy to appear in court on Sept. 14, 2011
to explain why she did not comply with the subpoena. On Aug. 30, the Court RESCHEDULED it
for Nov. 21, 2011.
In
1881, Chester Arthur usurped the Presidency because he too was not a natural
born citizen. He, like Obama, lied about the CITIZENSHIP of
his parents.
The American people deserve a constitutionally qualified
President, one who is a natural born citizen based on the definition as
documented in the historical and legal record. Please look into these matters and let me know
if you find them to be true and, if so, what course of action the Division of
Elections will take. Thank you kindly.
Sincerely,
Jim Black
