Obama's Vision For America

President Obama is working hard to convert America into a European style socialist state.  His attempts so far have created the typical European Socialist style LOSS OF JOBS, WORST ECONOMY SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION, etc., etc., etc..


Here is a night time satellite image of Socialist North Korea directly compared with Capitalist South Korea.


This is what Obama is INTENTIONALLY trying to turn America into - A Third World, European style, Socialist country - THE QUESTION IS, ARE WE GOING TO ALLOW HIM TO DO IT?

Obama Associates

Are you going to vote for Obama in November 2012?  Which groups and individuals does Obama get his greatest support from?

He was recently endorsed by The Socialist Party USA (SPUSA), the Communist Party USA (CPUSA, later caught deleting all references of supporting Obama from their web site), the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA, who in my post HERE, claimed 70 cardholding socialist Democrats in Congress), Hamas endorses Obama, the ACLU, Muslims (80% approval), National Organization For Women (NOW, also supporting abortion on demand and same sex mariage), the Black Panthers Organization, ACORN, Planned Parenthood,  Common, a rapper/poet who sings of cop killing, 20 years in the congregation of Rev. Wright, with his “God damn America” rhetoric, and Union support in the hundreds of millions of dollars.  These, along with progressive liberals make up Obama’s constituents.

Obama’s “green jobs” czar, and Communist Van Johnson resigned amid controversy concerning past inflammatory un-American remarks.  Obama supports  his “Safe School’s” Czar Kevin Jennings, who supports the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).  NAMBLA is promoting legalizing consensual sex AND marriage between adult males and male children of any age.  Jennings publically praised Marxist & Communist Harry Hay, the founder of NAMBLA.  Mr. Hay was also openly homosexual who abandoned the Comunist Party USA, and his wife who he met when they were both members of the American Communist Party, in order to set up the first official gay rights group in the USA, the Mattachine Society.   Jennings also edited a book called “Becoming Visible: A Reader in Gay and Lesbian History” for High School and College Students which included a biographical sketch on Harry Hay.  This “bizarre trend” of Jenning’s was only curious until he admitted illegally hiding pedophilia information from school officials when he was a teacher in Massachusetts.  It was while a teacher that Jennings also founded the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) which now has 40 chapters in schools nationwide.  Would YOU have made Jennings your “Safe Schools CZAR”?  Hard to understand how that could happen isn’t it?  

If you are a speed reader, Google Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, Fr. Michael Pflegler, Saul Alinsky, Tony Rezko, Geithner tax cheat, Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez, Kathleen McGrade, etc., etc., etc.

Do you think it is an accident that President Obama surrounds himself with these kinds of “associates”?

President Obama also appointed Amanda Simpson, who describes herself as “one of the first transgender appointees to the federal government,” as a senior technical adviser to the Commerce Department.   Other reports say that Simpson, a member of the board of the National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE) for the past three years, is the first openly transgender presidential appointee.  NCTE, like the Center for American Progress, is funded by the Open Society Institute of billionaire George Soros.  NCTE received $50,000 from the Open Society Institute in 2007.  The Soros group gave $70,000 to the Transgender Law Center in San Francisco in the same year.  “The global economic crisis and recent changes in the U.S. political environment have elevated the risks and opportunities for building a better society, resulting in a ‘perfect storm’ for transformative change in America,” declares the Open Society Institute.

 

Pretty “motley crew” crew of supporters, huh?  All those bizarre relationships above are pretty scary, but let’s get back to the recent overwhelming Muslim approval.

Muslims Give Obama 80% Approval Rating
With President Barack Obama’s overall approval ratings hovering around all-time lows, one group remains strongly supportive of Obama and his performance on the job:  Muslim Americans.

Muslims Give Obama 80% Approval Rating

With President Barack Obama’s overall approval ratings hovering around all-time lows, one group remains strongly supportive of Obama and his performance on the job:  Muslim Americans (80% approval).

You can tell a lot about a candidate by looking at where his support comes from.  O bama was recently endorsed by the Socialist Party USA (SPUSA) and the Communist Party USA (CPUSA,  although they were caught scrubbing all Obama endorsements from their web site).  The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA, who recently claimed in my post here that there are 70 card holding socialist Democrat congressmen in the US congress)NAMLA

An overwhelming 80 percent of Muslim Americans approve of the way Obama is handling his job, according to a newly released survey by the Abu Dhabi Gallup Center, a partnership between Gallup and the Crown Prince Court of Abu Dhabi.

Jewish Americans — many of whom disapprove of Obama’s policies regarding Israel — nevertheless give him a 65 percent approval rating.  His approval rating among atheists, agnostics, and those of no religion is 60 percent; among Catholics, 50 percent; among Protestants, 37 percent; and among LDS, just 25 percent.

Obama’s favorable rating among Muslim Americans has gone down slightly since 2009, when it stood at 84 percent, but still remains far higher than President George W. Bush’s rating among Muslim Americans in 2008, 7 percent.

Unfortunately for Obama, Muslim Americans are the least likely members of any major religious group to be registered to vote — 65 percent compared with 91 percent of Protestant Americans and Jewish Americans, according to the Abu Dhabi Gallup Center.

This may be because many Muslim Americans are first-generation immigrants and may not yet be citizens. Muslim Americans as a group are also significantly younger than people of other religions — 36 on average — and youth is often associated with low voter-registration levels.

If we can hold down voter fraud in all its forms, voter intimidation, denial of military ballots, and also expect voter fall-off for college age voters and Muslim voters, that may provide good news for America in November 2012.

The Ideology of Obama's Folly

Read carefully because the below Socialist Party USA “manifesto” explains clearly the path Obama supposes to force us down.  


It even shows why Obama DEMANDS certain compromises in bills such as the recent budget “crisis” and ObamaCare.  In the Oct 2009 edition of their American Socialist Voter newsletter (below), they even listed the US legislators who belong to their organization in 2009.

“Who We Are” from the Socialist Party USA (SPUSA) Statement of Principles....

THE SOCIALIST PARTY (SPUSA) strives to establish a radical democracy that places people's lives under their own  control - a non-racist, classless, feminist socialist society... where working people own and control the means of production and distribution through democratically-controlled public agencies; where full employment is realized for everyone who wants to work; where workers have the right to form unions freely, and to strike and engage in other forms of job actions; and where the production of society is used for the benefit of all humanity, not for the private profit of a few. We believe socialism and democracy are one and indivisible.  The working class is in a key and central position to fight back against the ruling capitalist class and its power.  The working class is the major force worldwide that can lead the way to a socialist future - to a real radical democracy from below.  The Socialist Party fights for progressive changes compatible with a socialist future.  We support militant working class struggles and electoral action, independent of the capitalist controlled two-party system, to present socialist alternatives.  We strive for democratic revolutions - radical and fundamental changes in the structure and quality of economic, political, and personal relations - to abolish the power now exercised by the few who control great wealth and the government.  The Socialist Party is a democratic, multi-tendency organization, with structure and practices visible and accessible to all members.

The Socialist Party of America announced in their October 2009 newsletter that 70 Congressional democrats currently belong to their caucus which also includes the group Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).  This admission was recently posted on Scribd.com:

American Socialist Voter Oct 2009 newsletter –

Q: How many members of the U.S. Congress are also members of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)?
A: Seventy

Q: How many of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) members sit on the Judiciary Committee?
A: Eleven:   John Conyers (Chairman of the Judiciary Committee), Tammy Baldwin, Jerrold Nadler, Luis Gutierrez, Melvin Watt, Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, Steve Cohen, Barbara Lee, Robert Wexler, Linda Sanchez (there are 23 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee of which eleven, almost half, are now members of the DSA).

Q: Who are these Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) members of the 111th Congress?
A: See the listing below

Co-Chairs

Hon. Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-07)

Hon. Lynn Woolsey (CA-06)

Vice Chairs

Hon. Diane Watson (CA-33)

Hon. Sheila Jackson-Lee (TX-18)

Hon. Mazie Hirono (HI-02)

Hon. Dennis Kucinich (OH-10)

Senate Members

Hon. Bernie Sanders (VT)

House Members

Hon. Neil Abercrombie (HI-01)

Hon. Tammy Baldwin (WI-02)

Hon. Madeleine Bordallo (GU-AL)

Hon. Xavier Becerra (CA-31) 

Hon. Robert Brady (PA-01)

Hon. Corrine Brown (FL-03)

Hon. Michael Capuano (MA-08)

Hon. André Carson (IN-07)

Hon. Donna Christensen (VI-AL)

                                                              Hon. Yvette Clarke (NY-11)

                                                                Hon. William “Lacy” Clay (MO-01)

Hon. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05)

Hon. Steve Cohen (TN-09)

Hon. John Conyers (MI-14)

Hon. Elijah Cummings (MD-07)

Hon. Danny Davis (IL-07)

Hon. Peter DeFazio (OR-04)

Hon. Rosa DeLauro (CT-03)

Rep. Donna F. Edwards (MD-04)

Hon. Keith Ellison (MN-05)

Hon. Sam Farr (CA-17)

Hon. Chaka Fattah (PA-02)

Hon. Bob Filner (CA-51)

Hon. Barney Frank (MA-04)

Hon. Marcia L. Fudge (OH-11)

Hon. Alan Grayson (FL-08)

Hon. Luis Gutierrez (IL-04)

Hon. John Hall (NY-19)

Hon. Phil Hare (IL-17)

Hon. Maurice Hinchey (NY-22)

Hon. Michael Honda (CA-15)

Hon. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02)

Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)

Hon. Hank Johnson (GA-04)

Hon. Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)

Hon. Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13)

Hon. Barbara Lee (CA-09)

Hon. John Lewis (GA-05)

Hon. David Loebsack (IA-02)

Hon. Ben R. Lujan (NM-3)

Hon. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14)

Hon. Ed Markey (MA-07)

Hon. Jim McDermott (WA-07)

Hon. James McGovern (MA-03)

Hon. George Miller (CA-07)

Hon. Gwen Moore (WI-04)

Hon. Jerrold Nadler (NY-08)

Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC-AL)

Hon. John Olver (MA-01)

Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04)

Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10)

Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01)

Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15)

Hon. Laura Richardson (CA-37)

Hon. Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34)

Hon. Bobby Rush (IL-01)

Hon. Linda Sánchez (CA-47)

Hon. Jan Schakowsky (IL-09)

Hon. José Serrano (NY-16)

Hon. Louise Slaughter (NY-28)

Hon. Pete Stark (CA-13)

Hon. Bennie Thompson (MS-02)

Hon. John Tierney (MA-06)

Hon. Nydia Velazquez (NY-12)

Hon. Maxine Waters (CA-35)

Hon. Mel Watt (NC-12)

Hon. Henry Waxman (CA-30)

Hon. Peter Welch (VT-AL)

Hon. Robert Wexler (FL-19)

Looks like a lot of socialists in our government?  And that list above doesn’t even include President Obama and his administration, cabinet, and staff.  Now do you understand why we are being forced down the path toward socialism?  You might want to include the above list of legislators on your mailing lists, e-mailing lists, Tweet lists, and fax lists, for your “socialization” of America concerns.  If you don’t become pro-active, you will look up one day soon and see that we are already there!

The next few paragraphs are just plain scary!  They are found on page 10 of 10/1/09 edition of the American Socialist Voter newsletter (scroll down to page 10 on the link above).  I think it is pretty safe to assume that all of the above legislators, along with President Obama believe in these principles of Social Redistribution listed in their newsletter below?  Especially notice that the “Social Redistribution” is not just redistribution of wealth, but also redistributions of “resources”.  It’s no accident we are being forced, head long down this slippery slope by the Obama administration and other card carrying legislators listed above.

If you read the below “manifesto” from the Oct 2009 edition of the American Socialist Voter newsletter, carefully, it makes clear the reason behind every unfathomable decision taken by Obama and his administration.

Socialized Redistribution

Socialized redistribution--the shift of wealth AND RESOURCES from the rich to the rest of society—will require:

1.  Massive redistribution of income from corporations and the wealthy to wage earners and the poor and the public sector, in order to provide the main source of new funds for social programs, income maintenance andinfrastructure rehabilitation

2.   A massive shift of public resources from the military (the main user of existing discretionary funds) to civilian uses. Although such reforms will be very difficult to achieve on a national scale in the short term, their urgency increases as income inequality intensifies.  Over time, income redistribution and social programs will be critical not only to the poor but to the great majority of working people.  The defense and expansion of government programs that promote social justice, equal education for all children, universal health care, environmental protection, and guaranteed minimum income and social well-being, is critical for the next Left.   At the same time, the military Keynesianism that has dominated federal expenditures, constricting the capacity of governments at all levels to respond adequately to social needs, must end. Much of the current distortion in government spending and taxation has its roots in the massive military and national security build-up in the 1980s, combined with the massive tax cuts for the wealthy. The great run-up in national debt is due directly to military-led deficit financing.  Reduced military expenditures and more equitable taxation represent the only sources of funds on the scale needed to provide the social programs required to ameliorate declining living standards.  Together, economic democracy, global justice, and social redistribution are the linchpins of a broad-based anti-corporate left, that is international in character and local in its reliance on popular control of economic resources and decision-making.

SECTION 5:  THE ROLE OF ELECTORAL POLITICS

Democratic socialists reject an either-or approach to electoral coalition building, focused solely on a new party or on realignment within the Democratic Party. The growth of PAC-driven, candidate-based, entrepreneurial politics in the last25 years leaves little hope for an immediate, principled electoral response to the rightward, pro-corporate drift in American politics.  The fundamental task of democratic socialists is to build anti-corporate social movements capable of winning reforms that empower people. Since such social movements seek to influence state policy, they will intervene in electoral politics, whether through Democratic primaries, non-partisan local elections, or third party efforts. Our electoral work aims at building “majoritarian” coalitions capable of not only electing public officials on the anti-corporate program of these movements, but also of holding officials accountable after they are elected.  The U.S. electoral system makes third parties difficult to build at both the national and state level.  Winner take-all districts; the absence of proportional representation; open primaries; executive-run governments that make coalition governments impossible; state legislative control over ballot access and election laws all combine to impede third parties.  Much of progressive, independent political action will continue to occur in Democratic Party primaries in support of candidates who represent a broad progressive coalition. In such instances, democratic socialists will support coalitional campaigns based on labor, women, people of color and other potentially anti-corporate elements.  Electoral tactics are only a means for democratic socialists; the building of a powerful anti-corporate coalition is the end result expectation.  Where third party or non-partisan candidates mobilize such coalitions, democratic socialists will build such organizations and candidacies.  However, to democratize U.S. electoral politics - whatever its party form -requires serious campaign finance reform both within and without the Democratic Party.

Obama's Poker Face

“Don’t Call My Bluff”?

Wait a minute, hold on a second, did Barack Hussein Obama, POTUS and “poker player supreme” just tell the GOP leadership and everyone else in the United States that he is just BLUFFING when he issues another empty threat to GOP leaders that he will veto any Republican attempt to pass a “short term” debt limit increase?

In the game of politics, when your opponent declares publically that he is BLUFFING, isn’t the wise option to call his bluff and immediately raise him?

Am I the only one to see this?

GOP LEGISLATORS, CALL HIS BLUFF!

Watch what happens to his approval if he actually stops Social Security payments instead of reducing the deficit!

Watch what happens to his approval if he issues furloughs for police/firefighters instead of furloughs for the bloat of overpaid Federal employees!

Watch what happens if he stops paychecks for our military HEROS instead of stopping the checks of his huge personal staff, and the 10,000 recent, new IRS employees!

Watch what happens if he cuts Medicare payments instead of cutting duplicate federal agencies!

Watch what happens if he proposes another stimulus package instead of reducing spending to lower the runaway deficit!

Watch what happens to his 2011 re-election campaign!

This mistake could create “Change that we CAN believe in”, and we the people would be the winners, because it’s a Win - Win situation for the United States, whether he came to his senses and supported the GOP push for fiscal responsibility, or decided to follow his veto, along with his Socialist ideology straight down into the toilet.  Either way, the PEOPLE win!

NO DEBT CEILING RAISE WITHOUT EQUAL REDUCTION IN SPENDING

Watch this EXCELLENT Hannity - Palin interview on Fox News

Palin Debt Ceiling Crisis Interview on Hannity at Fox News

WE CALL YOU MR OBAMA, AND RAISE YOU $14.3 TRILLION

e-mails of this post sent to friends, pundits, and legislators