Search BillboTex's Blog-A-Sphere

Showing posts with label progressive. Show all posts
Showing posts with label progressive. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Most Important Post in the Last Three Years

For me, this is the most important post I have read during the societal crisis we find ourselves trapped in over the last three years!  It gives me a feeling more of anger than fear.  It gives me more a feeling of resignation than of futility.  It gives me more of a feeling of PRIDE than DEPENDENCY.

We find ourselves in this position because not me, not any of us took responsibility to stand tall, when we had the opportunity to make a difference.  To avoid where we find ourselves now, we would have to had begun working tirelessly, since before the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidency.  We didn't step up to that task at that critical time.

I had felt that there was something that President Obama was not understanding.  I don't believe that I was correct in that feeling.  Now I feel that he is fully aware of everything he is trying to accomplish, including his own exaltation.  He is a man, who like many who have been brought up in broken families, somehow has lost out on the native attribute of empathy for his fellow human beings.  He is a man who because of his family situation and his free choice of friends and mentors, has become antisocial, and I mean antisocial in the classical psychiatric definition of inability to feel fault or blame for his detrimental effect on others.

When I say that I believe this to be the most important post for me or anyone else, I don't mean that this will be the most comforting post for me or for you, but it might be THE MOST IMPORTANT if things can't be stabilized in our country by November 2012.  This post requires difficult choices that may be necessary for us to implement, which would mean major changes in our lives, but we are having major changes in our lives FORCED upon us already - These changes may be unavoidable.  We didn't ask for it, but we MUST adjust to it.  I will have to think about this post for quite a while before I decide how to react.  But I believe it is EXTREMELY important to all my friends, and EVERYONE.

The changes they are suggesting, are to give us protection from undesired changes in lifestyle, changes in WHERE we live, changes in HOW we live, and possibly will mean changes in WHETHER OR NOT we will live!

These "Nullification patriots" are special people with a logical point of view that I think could have been helpful to all of us if things REALLY broke down.  I thought that Nullification might be a promising method to help us get our country back.  I have met some of them and attended their conferences in Austin over the past six or eight months.  This post of theirs, is VERY different from the advice, planning, or even the TONE, of anything I have heard from them before, either in their conferences, or in their e-mails, or in their posts.

This seems to be an expression from them for all of us to become better prepared for the worst that could happen.  And whether you trust them the way I do, or not, please read their post and decide for yourself if you think there is anything important here for you and your families.

I believe that it is HONEST, FROM THE HEART, and VERY IMPORTANT TO ALL OF US!  Please read it.


Getting off the Globalist Chessboard. An Introduction

By Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers
and Brandon Smith of the Alternative Market Project

NOTE: Stewart Rhodes will be a featured speaker at Nullify Now! Jacksonville. Get tickets here – http://www.nullifynow.com/jacksonville – or by calling 888-71-TICKETS

********

To put it simply, America is nearing a checkmate scenario.  Like the final torrid maneuvers of a rigged chess match, we have been pressed, manipulated, and attacked into the last remaining corner of the “grand global chessboard” left to us;  centralized control of all social and economic power into the hands of an unworthy, progressive elite.  If we continue playing the game by their rules, we will lose.  There is no doubt.  There have been many solutions presented to us in the past to combat this development, but nearly all of them function within the constraints of Federal politics.  Working within the system has earned us no quarter, and frankly, no results.  Our only recourse (and, frankly, the best recourse all along) is to STOP relying on the rules of their game, and to walk away from the chess board completely.

Globalization is essentially just another word for centralization, and the key to centralizing any system is to remove all options until the masses are completely and utterly dependent upon a single dominant paradigm.  Globalists have deceived many Americans into believing that centralization is a “natural” process – that their game is indeed the only one in town.  The widespread acceptance of the fiat monetary system is a perfect example of the average person’s unfortunate lack of economic flexibility. Only recently, in the face of dollar devaluation and complete financial collapse have many finally begun to question the legitimacy of a single brittle and corrupt economic structure.  American politics are no different.

The elites have conned us into thinking that the only possible “solution” to where we are is federal elections, which only vote in new puppets for the puppet masters to manipulate in an illusory shell game.  We have been tricked into thinking we are free because we come together from time to time to select our rulers.

But of course, this country was not founded as a democracy, but as a Constitutional Republic, and in such a Republic as ours, liberty is not just about “kicking the bums out” every few years only to vote a new set of bums into Congress, as the globalists would have us think.  Federal elections are just one small part of it.  The Founders intended us to be active, sovereign citizens, in strong communities and strong, sovereign states, and that is about far, far more than merely voting.

But because the globalists – with the aid of complicit domestic counterparts – have been able to capture our education system, our media, our political system, and our legal system, they have succeeded in dumbing us down and duping us into thinking that all other mechanisms for constraining power have been removed from the table.  In fact, we have been convinced that all of the other fundamental institutions of our republic – aside from voting – are illegitimate, or even criminal.

The Founders gave us a dual sovereignty republic.  That means states are as much sovereign within their sphere as the national government is within its sphere, with a national government of limited, enumerated, and divided powers.  As our Tenth Amendment makes clear, “[t]he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

In Federalist 45, James Madison (widely considered the ‘father of the Constitution”) promised the American people that:

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined.  Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.  The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce;  with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.  The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.

Clearly the design of the Founders’ has been turned on its head.  With the aid of complicit judges – which Thomas Jefferson called a “corps of sappers and miners” – who willfully misinterpret the Commerce Clause to grant Congress the power to regulate literally anything, we now have a ruling class who will admit of no restraints on national power with a national government of nearly unlimited de facto powers, grown like a metastasizing cancer far beyond the bounds of anything foreseen by even the most skeptical of Anti-Federalists from the Founding era.  All actual, physical and structural powers of any real meaning – legislative, military, legal, law enforcement, and economic – are consolidated in the hands of the federal government.  On top of this, they have grafted a hydra-like overlay of international law and international unelected agencies and untouchable international “officials” that are also being imposed up us by means of treaties, executive partnerships (such as the supposedly now defunct Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, now being revitalized by the Obama Administration) and other constitutionally dubious mechanisms.

While we are distracted with elections, they are planning the destruction of the dollar, the collapse of our economy, the final destruction of our sovereignty, and the total absorption of our entire system into the vapid body of an unaccountable global government.

This is why we must stop playing by their “rules,” must get off of their artificial chess board, and instead play by the rules of our Constitution.  This means taking power into our own hands as individuals, communities, counties, and states.

To do this, Neithercorp Press, the Alternative Market Project, and Oath Keepers are working together to focus on concrete solutions that can be applied by the average American in their day-to-day lives, in both the private and public spheres.  In the limited time we have left, we urge Americans to focus on the following four key strategies (arranged in order of priority of needs):

1.  Food and fuel independence and security – and other essential infrastructure (general preparedness) – as individuals, within local veterans organization chapters, neighborhood mutual aid societies, churches, co-ops, farmers markets, and at the town, county and state levels).  In the aftermath of an economic collapse, food is the hardest necessity to improvise, and food scarcity is a serious achiles heel, exploited by oppressive regimes throughout history.  To get started on food storage and independence, follow the advice on providentliving.org (you don’t need to be LDS to learn from their experience in food storage and preparedness, or to use their canneries).  Likewise, we will need fuel, emergency medical, and resilient communication that can function in a grid-down crisis, devoid of internet communication (or with the internet shut down intentionally by means of a kill-switch).

2.  Physical security and Independence - again as individuals, neighborhoods, towns, counties and states, to include forming neighborhood watches, mutual aid associations, a volunteer sheriff’s posse (staffed by volunteers under direct command of the sheriff), and county militias established by county ordinances but staffed by self-supplied and self-funded volunteers (as is done in volunteer fire departments all over this nation), and ultimately, a true state militia capable of “repelling invasions” (using the research and model bills of Dr. Edwin Vieira).  Americans have plenty of guns, but not enough organization.  See operationsleepinggiant.org for details.

3.  Economic security and independence - as individuals and communities, including barter networks, use of silver and gold as real money, the development of valuable trade skills, and sound money bills at the county and state levels (as Utah just passed into law).  The localization of community commerce is the only sure way to counter globalization.  The more independent and insulated cities and states are from the corrupt and dysfunctional mainstream economy, the more safe and secure they will find themselves when that economy implodes.  We must have an alternative to the fiat money system in place to preempt such an event.  See alt-market.com for details.

4.  State sovereignty and nullification of unconstitutional federal laws and actions.  Veterans must support only sheriffs, state legislators and governors who have the guts and integrity to keep their oaths.  To vote for an oath breaker, is to become an oath breaker.  We must defend the powers reserved to the states and to the people by supporting state sovereignty resolutions and nullification of unconstitutional laws.  See tenthamendmentcenter.com. And eventually we must kick the bums out, as GOOOH recommends. See goooh.com.

We will soon be publishing an upcoming series of articles that will provide in-depth details on each of the above four key pillars of action.  While we should not turn our backs on the tactics of educating the public, supporting constitutional legislation, voting for honest and principled representatives, or nullifying unconstitutional laws (we should certainly make full use of the soap box, the ballot box, and the jury box) it is now time to dedicate ourselves to much more.  The very future of our country, our liberties, and the prosperity of the next generation depends upon this.

For the Republic,

Stewart Rhodes
Brandon Smith

You can contact Brandon Smith at: brandon@alt-market.com

Want to get started building a barter group to protect your town, city, or state from economic disaster?  Visit our networking page, sign up, and meet like-minded people in your area now!

http://www.alt-market.com/social

This ties in VERY closely with my post THE PARADOX of COMPROMISE

Sunday, August 28, 2011

Obama - Progressive Trojan Horse


A BLACK MAN, THE PROGRESSIVE'S PERFECT TROJAN HORSE
By Lloyd Marcus March, 2010  


Lloyd Marcus Unhyphenated American   Singer/Songwriter, Entertainer, Author, Artist & Tea Party Patriot


As millions of my fellow Americans, I am outraged, devastated and extremely angry by the democrat's unbelievable arrogance and disdain for We The People.  Despite our screaming "no" from the rooftops, they forced ObamaCare down our throats.  Please forgive me for using the following crude saying, but it is very appropriate to describe what has happened. "Don't urinate on me and tell me it's raining."  Democrats say their mission is to give all Americans health care.  The democrats are lying.  Signing ObamaCare into law against our will and the Constitution is tyranny and step one of their hideous goal of having as many Americans as possible dependent on government, thus controlling our lives and fulfilling Obama's promise to fundamentally transform America .

I keep asking myself, how did our government move so far from the normal procedures of getting things done?  Could a white president have so successfully pulled off shredding the Constitution to further his agenda?  I think not.   








Ironically, proving America is completely the opposite of the evil racist country they relentlessly accuse her of being, progressives used America’s goodness, guilt and sense of fair play against her.  In their quest to destroy America as we know it, progressives borrowed a brilliant scheme from Greek mythology.  They offered America a modern day Trojan Horse, a beautifully crafted golden shiny new black man as a presidential candidate.  Democrat Joe Biden lorded Obama as the first clean and articulate African American candidate.  Democrat Harry Reid said Obama only uses a black dialect when he wants.  


 
White America relished the opportunity to vote for a black man naively believing they would never suffer the pain of being called racist again.  Black Americans viewed casting their vote for Obama as the ultimate Affirmative Action for America’s sins of the past. 

Then there were the entitlement loser voters who said,   "I'm votin' for the black dude who promises to take from those rich SOBs and give to me."

Just as the deceived Trojans dragged the beautifully crafted Trojan Horse into Troy as a symbol of their victory, deceived Americans embraced the progressive's young, handsome, articulate and so called moderate black presidential candidate as a symbol of their liberation from accusation of being a racist nation.  Also like the Trojan Horse, Obama was filled with the enemy hiding inside.   

Sunday, March 21, 2010, a secret door opened in Obama, the shiny golden black man.  A raging army of progressive-democrats charged out.  Without mercy, they began their vicious bloody slaughter of every value, freedom and institution we Americans hold dear;  launching the end of America as we know it. 





 Wielding swords of votes reeking with the putrid odor of back door deals, the democrats landed a severe death blow to America and individual rights by passing Obamacare.

The mainstream liberal media has been relentlessly badgering the Tea Party movement with accusations of racism.  Because I am a black tea party patriot, I am bombarded with interviewers asking me the same veiled question.  "Why are you siding with these white racists against America’s first African American president?"  I defend my fellow patriots who are white stating,   "These patriots do not give a hoot about Obama's skin color.  They simply love their country and oppose his radical agenda. Obama's race is not an issue."

Recently, I have come to believe that perhaps I am wrong about Obama's race not being an issue.  In reality, Obama's presidency has everything to do with racism, but not from the Tea Party movement.  Progressives and Obama have exploited his race from the rookie senator's virtually unchallenged presidential campaign to his unprecedented bullying of America into ObamaCare.  Obama's race trumped all normal media scrutiny of him as a presidential candidate and most recently even the Constitution of the United States.  ObamaCare forces all Americans to purchase health care which is clearly unconstitutional.

No white president could get away with boldly and arrogantly thwarting the will of the American people and ignoring laws.  President Clinton tried universal health care.  Bush tried social security reform.  The American people said "no" to both president's proposals and it was the end of it.  So how can Obama get away with giving the American people the finger?  The answer.  He is black. 

The mainstream liberal media continues to portray all who oppose Obama in any way as racist.  Despite a list of failed policies, overreaches into the private sector, violations of the Constitution and planned destructive legislation too numerous to mention in this article, many Americans are still fearful of criticizing our first black president.  Incredible.





My fellow Americans, you must not continue to allow yourselves to be "played" and intimidated by Obama's race or the historical context of his presidency.  If we are to save America, the greatest nation on the planet, Obama's progressive agenda must be stopped.




Monday, August 22, 2011

Obama, the Hypocrite-In-Chief



Progressive Hypocrisy
Posted by Henry Lamb August 22, 2011 on GOPUSA



Henry Lamb is the author of “THE RISE of GLOBAL GOVERNANCE”, Chairman of Sovereignty International, and founder of the Environmental Conservation Organization (ECO) andFreedom21, Inc.


When George Bush invaded Iraq, anti-war zealots hit the streets raising forty-leven kinds of hell:  “Bush lied; people died,” rang across the land.  Bush acted on intelligence gathered and agreed to by the U.N., Great Britain, and virtually all U.S. allies.  Bush obtained approval from Congress to take whatever action he deemed necessary.  He tried, in vain, to get U.N. approval.  He set a time and date.  He invaded.  And, the Progressive anti-war zealots went crazy.


When Barack Obama invaded Libya, the anti-war zealots were non- existent.  Obama had NO intelligence suggesting that Libya was a threat to the U.S.  He did NOT bother to even ASK FOR APPROVAL from Congress as is required by the War Powers Act.  He told no one;  he just unleashed millions of dollars of bombs and missiles on a tiny country that could not possibly do us harm.  The anti-war Progressives looked the other way, and said nothing.
Obama said he was acting in response to the U.N., that the action would be a matter of days, not weeks.  That was six months ago, and the U.S. is still involved.  Obama lied; people died, and the Progressive anti-war zealots said nothing.

Where is CINDY SHEEHAN? Why is she not camping out in front of Obama’s Chicago home, as she camped out in front of Bush’s Texas home?


Could it be that Progressives are hypocrites?


In March, 2006, both Senators Barack Obama and Harry Reid condemned George Bush’s request to raise the debt ceiling, claiming that the request was a “failure of leadership.”  Both voted against raising the debt ceiling.  But in 2011, both condemned the Republicans for objecting to raising the debt ceiling, claiming that failure to raise the ceiling was “irresponsible.”


Classic hypocrisy!

(Comment from BillboTex:  I am actually inserting the next four videos AND NOT THE LINKS, because these four have been repeatedly removed/replaced by YouTube, and so I have no idea if the links will still be there!)

Obama promised a TRANSPARENT GOVERNMENT

Even liberal CNN SAID OBAMA LIED , and he continues to do his dirty work behind closed doors.

Nancy Pelosi promised that the health care bill would be posted on the internet for 72 hours before the vote. Then PELOSI SAID “We have to pass the bill before you can find out what’s in it…”

Obama promised that no lobbyists would be allowed in his administration, but then proceeded to ALLOW LOBBYISTS TO FILL HIS ADMINISTRATION

Gross hypocrisy!

Obama said that President Bush and the Republicans “drove the economy into the ditch”.  He failed to mention the economic disaster caused by the terrorist attacks on 9/11, or the two wars, or Hurricane Katrina – all of which were unexpected and took a heavy toll on the treasury.  After nearly three years under Obama’s control and stewardship, the economy is in much worse shape than ever, and he is quick to blame Bush, an earthquake in Japan, high gas prices, and instability in the Middle East.

Sickening - just sickening, hypocrisy.

Here is a POST ON FACTCHECK.ORG http://www.factcheck.org/2011/04/factchecking-obamas-budget-speech/  that provides a few indicators of just how Obama’s economic policies have worsened the economy.  Note that the price of gasoline increased from $1.838 on January 10, 2009, to $3.111 on January 20, 2011.  The price has continued to rise, reaching $4.00 per gallon in some parts of the country.  Despite this dramatic price increase, and the instability in the Middle East, Obama and his Progressive administration refuse to allow development of domestic oil, and continue to promote a carbon tax.  Obama’s EPA is even trying to implement stricter emission-control regulations by rule, to further restrict the availability of gasoline.

Obama and his media machine TALK ENDLESSLY ABOUT CREATING JOBS, but in reality, he refuses to unleash more than 750,000 new jobs that would be created by opening domestic oil reserves.  Instead, he has INCREASED FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT by more than 230,000 jobs, guaranteeing those votes for himself, while the public sector lost 7.5 million jobs.  Moreover, he has doubled the number of federal jobs that pay in excess of $150.000 per year, while income in the public sector has decreased since he took office.



Progressives are hypocrites.  Their only concern is to prevail, regardless of what it takes.  The end always justifies any means that may be required.  The Progressive Obama administration has clearly demonstrated its belief in this principle.  It has lied, deceived, distorted, manipulated, pointed fingers, and still, the economy worsens, America’s standing in the world continues to fall, and all the Obama administration is concerned about is getting re-elected in 2012.



What kind of unmitigated gall is required to declare that his three-day campaign tour through the Midwest is not a campaign tour, but a perfectly legal tax-funded tour to meet and talk to the people?  And when that’s complete, he will bypass the tax-paid vacation retreat at Camp David, and go instead to a mansion on Cape Cod where he can commiserate with all the people who can’t find a job, and who can’t make next month’s mortgage payment.

Progressives are hypocrites who must be removed from the federal government.

Obama's public tax records PRIOR to his election as POTUS

Saturday, July 30, 2011

The PARADOX of Compromise


There is a post at the above link which discusses “Politics and the Paradox of Compromise”.   It was written by David Brooks, on his blog.  I was interested in reading the post because for many years I have noticed what I consider to be a paradox in the concept of compromise.

My suggestion is that you read the post above now, BEFORE you continue to read my post, and that way, my post can have no influence on your impressions of Mr. Brook's above post.  My 30 years in the medical profession imprinted me with the precepts of the scientific method, along with the usual “blind & double blind” constraints.

Hopefully you have read their post, so I will continue with my comments.

The author above defines the paradox as “Herein lies the paradox. Compromise has unambiguous merits across multiple domains, but it is an action to which much of the general population is often decidedly averse.”  His whole post seems flawed, although years ago, I noticed that there DOES EXIST a paradox in the nature of Compromise.

His definition is almost the exact opposite of the paradox of compromise that I noticed years ago, so this second paragraph of his post started an uncomfortable sensation for me.  And as I read further, it became pretty clear that this was the same paradox that I had noticed, but being spun by the liberal/progressive mindset.

My definition of the paradox that I saw can be presented in a “parallel construction” to Mr. Brook’s blog post's definition.  What I saw was “Herein lies the paradox.  Compromise has COMPLETELY ambiguous merits across multiple domains, and it is an action which can be an almost spiritual exercise in some domains, to which NO ONE is adverse, and utter depravity in others, to which EVERYONE is "decidedly adverse”.

This is the ambiguity and paradox that I saw years ago.

After I had recognized and defined the paradox that I saw – the “what”.

Then for me, the fun part started – figuring out what caused the paradox, and could it be cancelled out of the process of compromise – the “why” and "how"?  One common trick in the use of the scientific method is to reduce the number of variables as much as possible to make it easier to parse the fewer number of variables remaining.  So I turned MYSELF into the constant, and then needed to only look to the various domains for the answer of “how and why is there this paradox”.

Mr . Brooks asked the question “…why is it that we so readily preach compromise to our children, our spouses and our business partners but are so averse to it in practice?” – while he mentions the previous three domains, he later brings the domain of politics into the comparison.

The solution I came to years ago as to the “why” is related to the domain.  Any time I perceive the person I am trying to compromise with, as honest, guileless, and without ANY ulterior motive, then compromise  becomes the “almost spiritual exercise”, for example compromise with children, spouses, clergy, business partners, etc. 


But if I perceive the person as dishonest, corrupt, or hiding some ulterior motive, then the exercise becomes “utter depravity”, and the stronger my perception is, the more depraved the exercise seems.  For example compromise with a cheating spouse, enemy combatant, military interrogation, a criminal, a heroin addict, a sociopath, or a habitual liar, etc.

For me THAT is the paradox that I see, and also the solution to it.  So the next time you are compromising with a spouse on what your 13 year old daughter’s curfew is, when the 13 year-old is out at night – If you suggest 1am and then your spouse suggests 7am, so as to be able to create an ACTUAL 4am curfew, with this style of dishonest compromise, you don’t have the “almost spiritual” feeling which is possible under FAIR conditions. 

And as another example, if you are trying to reach a political compromise and you suggest your acceptance for a $2.4 TRILLION debt ceiling increase, as proposed by your compromise partner, and he refuses unless you allow him to raise it anytime, at his sole discretion each year, you may feel trapped in the feeling of “utter depravity”, the same as you might feel when trying to compromise with a sociopath, or habitual liar?

God Bless America